Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

Measurement of Tissue Oxygenation Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis
Published on: October 2, 2020
Native T1 mapping: inter-study, inter-observer and inter-center reproducibility in hemodialysis patients
Matthew P M Graham-Brown1,2,3, Elaine Rutherford4,5, E Levelt6
1John Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. mpmgb1@le.ac.uk.
Insights
Native T1 mapping using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is reproducible in hemodialysis patients and unaffected by fluid status changes. This technique shows potential as an imaging biomarker for myocardial fibrosis in end-stage renal disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
- Renal Disease Imaging
- Biomarker Development
Background:
- Native T1 mapping is a cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) technique associated with fibrosis and strain in hemodialysis (HD) patients.
- Reproducibility of T1 mapping in HD patients, who experience fluid status fluctuations, is not well-established.
- Accurate myocardial fibrosis quantification in HD patients may offer prognostic value.
Purpose of the Study:
- Assess the reproducibility of native T1 mapping in HD patients.
- Evaluate the impact of fluid status variations on native T1 values.
- Determine the potential of native T1 mapping as a biomarker for myocardial fibrosis in end-stage renal disease.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 3 Tesla CMR to assess inter-study, inter-observer, and intra-observer reproducibility of native T1 mapping.
- Examined inter-study reproducibility of left ventricular (LV) structure and function.
- Compared native T1 mapping and phantom analyses between two centers.
- Investigated the relationship between fluid status markers and native T1 values in HD patients.
Main Results:
- Native T1 mapping demonstrated excellent reproducibility with low coefficients of variation (CoV) for inter-study (0.7%), inter-observer (0.3%), and intra-observer (0.4%) variability.
- Left ventricular structure and function parameters showed good inter-study reproducibility (CoV: 1-5.6%).
- Inter-center analyses of native T1 mapping were excellent (CoV: 0.8-1.2%), with comparable phantom results across different scanners.
- Changes in body weight (fluid status) did not correlate with changes in native T1 values, indicating T1 mapping is unaffected by observed fluid status fluctuations.
Conclusions:
- Myocardial native T1 values are reproducible in hemodialysis patients.
- Native T1 mapping is not significantly affected by fluid status changes within the observed range.
- Native T1 mapping represents a promising imaging biomarker for assessing myocardial fibrosis in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Background:
Native T1 mapping is a cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) technique that associates with markers of fibrosis and strain in hemodialysis patients. The reproducibility of T1 mapping in hemodialysis patients, prone to changes in fluid status, is unknown. Accurate quantification of myocardial fibrosis in this population has prognostic potential.
Methods:
Using 3 Tesla CMR, we report the results of 1) the inter-study, inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility of native T1 mapping in 10 hemodialysis patients; 2) inter-study reproducibility of left ventricular (LV) structure and function in 10 hemodialysis patients; 3) the agreement of native T1 map and native T1 phantom analyses between two centres in 20 hemodialysis patients; 4) the effect of changes in markers of fluid status on native T1 values in 10 hemodialysis patients.
Results:
Inter-study, inter-observer and intra-observer variability of native T1 mapping were excellent with co-efficients of variation (CoV) of 0.7, 0.3 and 0.4% respectively. Inter-study CoV for LV structure and function were: LV mass = 1%; ejection fraction = 1.1%; LV end-diastolic volume = 5.2%; LV end-systolic volume = 5.6%. Inter-centre variability of analysis techniques were excellent with CoV for basal and mid-native T1 slices between 0.8-1.2%. Phantom analyses showed comparable native T1 times between centres, despite different scanners and acquisition sequences (centre 1: 1192.7 ± 7.5 ms, centre 2: 1205.5 ± 5 ms). For the 10 patients who underwent inter-study testing, change in body weight (Δweight) between scans correlated with change in LV end-diastolic volume (ΔLVEDV) (r = 0.682;P = 0.03) representing altered fluid status between scans. There were no correlations between change in native T1 between scans (ΔT1) and ΔLVEDV or Δweight (P > 0.6). Linear regression confirmed ΔT1 was unaffected by ΔLVEDV or Δweight (P > 0.59).
Conclusions:
Myocardial native T1 is reproducible in HD patients and unaffected by changes in fluid status at the levels we observed. Native T1 mapping is a potential imaging biomarker for myocardial fibrosis in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

