Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements
Marthe Lefsaker Sakrisvold1,2, Pär Anders Granhag2,3, Erik Mac Giolla2
1Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract:
How to discriminate between honest and deceptive alibi statements holds great legal importance. We examined this issue from the perspective of group deception. Our goals were to (a) compare the consistency between the statements of guilty and innocent suspects and those of their respective alibi witnesses, and (b) to examine the moderating role of object-salience on the level of consistency between their statements. Pairs of truth-tellers provided honest testimonies. Pairs of liars were divided into perpetrators and alibi witnesses. Statements of lying pairs were considerably more consistent than the statements of truth-telling pairs. In addition, both truth-tellers and liars showed lower levels of within-group consistency when recalling less salient details about an event. However, truth-tellers' consistency levels were considerably more affected by salience than were liars' consistency levels. These findings contribute to deception theory and have important implications for the real-life task of distinguishing between true and false alibi statements. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Cognitive Dissonance
Understanding Deception
Confirmation Biases
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

