Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.9K
Inter-group cooperation in humans and other animals
Elva J H Robinson1, Jessica L Barker2
1Department of Biology and York Centre for Complex Systems Analysis, University of York, York, UK elva.robinson@york.ac.uk.
Biology Letters
|March 3, 2017
Summary
Cooperation can emerge between social groups, especially when facing external threats or resource differences. This study explores the drivers of inter-group cooperation in humans and ants.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Behavioral ecology
- Social sciences
Background:
- Social interactions are typically cooperative within groups and competitive between groups.
- Inter-group cooperation is observed in certain circumstances across various species.
- Understanding the evolution of cooperation is crucial for social dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the conditions favoring the evolution of inter-group cooperation.
- To compare examples of inter-group cooperation in humans and ants.
- To identify future research directions in the study of cooperation.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of social behaviors in humans and ants.
- Examination of ecological and social drivers of cooperation.
- Review of factors influencing group identity and membership.
Main Results:
- Overarching threats (predators, competitors, adverse conditions) and resource asymmetries drive inter-group cooperation.
- Resource type differences can lead to inter-group specialization and division of labor, notably in humans.
- Group identity mechanisms are essential for social coherence and multiple group memberships.
Conclusions:
- Inter-group cooperation is shaped by ecological pressures and resource distribution.
- The study highlights the unique capacity for specialization in human inter-group cooperation.
- Further research is needed to fully understand the complex processes underlying cooperation between social groups.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Groups on Groups
296
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
296
Robbers Cave
14.9K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.9K
Altruism
48.2K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
48.2K
Inclusive Fitness
43.1K
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
43.1K
In- and Out-Groups
44.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
44.0K
Ethics in Research
26.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.1K

