Deceased Organ Donors and PHS Risk Identification: Impact on Organ Usage and Outcomes

Timothy L Pruett1, Marissa A Clark, Sarah E Taranto

  • 11 University of Minnesota, Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Minneapolis, MN. 2 Research Division, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA.

Transplantation
|March 3, 2017
PubMed

Insights

The 2013 PHS donor criteria change did not increase HIV, HBV, or HCV transmission risk to organ recipients. However, it reduced the utilization of high-quality organs from deceased donors.

Area of Science:

  • Transplantation immunology
  • Public health policy
  • Infectious disease transmission

Background:

  • In 2013, Public Health Service (PHS) criteria changed to identify organ donors at increased risk for HIV, HBV, and HCV.
  • The impact of this change on donor demographics, organ utilization, and patient outcomes was previously unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effects of the 2013 PHS donor designation policy on organ utilization and transplant outcomes.
  • To assess the risk of HIV, HBV, and HCV transmission associated with PHS-designated donors.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database.
  • Analysis of organ donor demographics, organ utilization rates, and patient/graft survival.
  • Comparison between PHS-designated and standard-risk deceased organ donors.

Main Results:

  • Over 20% of US deceased organ donors were classified as PHS increased risk post-2013.
  • PHS donors were younger, more likely male, and had different risk factors than standard donors.
  • Organs from younger PHS donors (18-34 years) tested negative for HCV were transplanted less frequently.
  • Patient and graft survival rates were equivalent, and HIV, HBV, HCV transmission risks were similar regardless of PHS donor status.

Conclusions:

  • The PHS donor designation criteria negatively impact the utilization of high-quality organs.
  • There is no demonstrated benefit in identifying a subset of organs with increased transmission risk for HIV, HBV, or HCV.
  • Reevaluation of the PHS donor designation rationale is warranted.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Kidney Transplant I: Introduction01:28

Kidney Transplant I: Introduction

A kidney transplant is a surgical approach that involves replacing a non-functioning kidney with a healthy one from a donor. This procedure is often a treatment option for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. The method requires careful recipient selection, including evaluating various medical and psychosocial factors. These criteria vary between transplant centers but generally include assessments of the patient's overall health, adherence to medical recommendations, and lifestyle...
611
Tissue Transplantation01:24

Tissue Transplantation

Tissue transplantation is a significant medical procedure involving the transfer of cells, tissues, or organs from a donor to a recipient, with the primary aim of restoring lost functions. This procedure is crucial in treating a broad spectrum of diseases, including kidney diseases, liver failure, heart disease, and certain types of cancers.
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
1.1K
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure01:26

Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure

Preoperative ManagementThe primary goals of preoperative management in kidney transplantation are to optimize the patient’s metabolic state and prepare them for surgery through diet adjustments, necessary dialysis, and tailored medical treatment. This phase also involves comprehensive infection screening and patient education about the surgical procedure and postoperative care to improve outcomes and adherence.Medical ManagementA comprehensive evaluation is required for both the living...
607