Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

12.9K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
12.9K
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks02:37

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

6.5K
DNA replication is initiated at sites containing predefined DNA sequences known as origins of replication. DNA is unwound at these sites by the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and other factors such as Cdc45 and the associated GINS complex.The unwound single strands are protected by replication protein A (RPA) until DNA polymerase starts synthesizing DNA at the 5’ end of the strand in the same direction as the replication fork. To prevent the replication fork from falling apart,...
6.5K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

23.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
23.1K
The Replisome03:01

The Replisome

39.1K
DNA replication is carried out by a large complex of proteins that act in a coordinated matter to achieve high-fidelity DNA replication. Together this complex is known as the DNA replication machinery or the replisome.
The synthesis of the leading and lagging strands is a highly coordinated process. To explain this, the “Trombone model” was proposed by Bruce Alberts in 1980. The DNA loop formation starts when a primer is synthesized on the parent lagging strand. The loop grows with...
39.1K
The DNA Replication Fork01:02

The DNA Replication Fork

42.0K
An organism’s genome needs to be duplicated in an efficient and error-free manner for its growth and survival. The replication fork is a Y-shaped active region where two strands of DNA are separated and replicated continuously. The coupling of DNA unzipping and complementary strand synthesis is a characteristic feature of a replication fork.   Organisms with small circular DNA, such as E. coli, often have a single origin of replication; therefore, they have only two replication...
42.0K
DNA Replication02:40

DNA Replication

62.4K
DNA replication involves the separation of the two strands of the double helix, with each strand serving as a template from which the new complementary strand is copied.  After replication, each double-stranded DNA includes one parental or “old” strand and one “new” strand. This is known as semiconservative replication. The resulting DNA molecules have the same sequence and are divided equally into the two daughter cells.
Replication in Prokaryotes
DNA replication...
62.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictive coding of cognitive processes in natural and artificial systems.

Cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

From learned value to sustained bias: how reward conditioning changes attentional priority.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2024
Same author

Mild traumatic brain injury history is associated with lower brain network resilience in soldiers.

Brain communications·2023
Same author

Blind Subgrouping of Task-based fMRI.

Psychometrika·2023
Same author

Reward history impacts attentional orienting and inhibitory control on untrained tasks.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2020
Same author

Attentional Control and Executive Function.

Cognitive neuroscience·2019
Same journal

On the clinical anatomy of technological cognition.

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Increasing statistical power in functional MRI through permutation and multivariate statistics.

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

fMRI research: do we need statistically better studies, larger studies, or no more studies?

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Catching the drift: EEG microstate dynamics resemble time-on-task changes in mind wandering and sustained attention.

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Toward a cognitive neuroscience of technology.

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

What behavioral relevance is (not).

Cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency
18:10

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency

Published on: June 16, 2011

30.2K

Replication and innovation versus a perfect '.05'.

Joseph B Hopfinger1

  • 1a Department of Psychology & Neuroscience , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.

Cognitive Neuroscience
|March 8, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical correction methods require random data for reliability assessment. Over-reliance on thresholds can hinder scientific replication and innovation, particularly in costly neuroimaging studies.

Keywords:
fMRIstatisticstype II errors

More Related Videos

G2-seq: A High Throughput Sequencing-based Technique for Identifying Late Replicating Regions of the Genome
06:40

G2-seq: A High Throughput Sequencing-based Technique for Identifying Late Replicating Regions of the Genome

Published on: March 22, 2018

6.3K
Author Spotlight: Characterizing DNA Replication of Pathogenic Repeats to Uncover Mechanisms of Replication Fork Stalling and Expansion
05:22

Author Spotlight: Characterizing DNA Replication of Pathogenic Repeats to Uncover Mechanisms of Replication Fork Stalling and Expansion

Published on: September 13, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency
18:10

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency

Published on: June 16, 2011

30.2K
G2-seq: A High Throughput Sequencing-based Technique for Identifying Late Replicating Regions of the Genome
06:40

G2-seq: A High Throughput Sequencing-based Technique for Identifying Late Replicating Regions of the Genome

Published on: March 22, 2018

6.3K
Author Spotlight: Characterizing DNA Replication of Pathogenic Repeats to Uncover Mechanisms of Replication Fork Stalling and Expansion
05:22

Author Spotlight: Characterizing DNA Replication of Pathogenic Repeats to Uncover Mechanisms of Replication Fork Stalling and Expansion

Published on: September 13, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Statistical analysis
  • Scientific methodology

Background:

  • Assessing the reliability of statistical correction procedures is crucial for scientific rigor.
  • Over-reliance on arbitrary thresholds can lead to biased interpretations of experimental results.
  • Expensive techniques like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) necessitate careful consideration of analytical methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the importance of using random data for evaluating statistical correction procedures.
  • To highlight the detrimental effects of over-reliance on specific thresholds in experimental design.
  • To underscore the critical role of inter-laboratory replication in scientific advancement.

Main Methods:

  • The study advocates for the use of truly random data in reliability assessments of statistical correction methods.
  • It critiques the practice of setting stringent thresholds for determining experimental validity.
  • The discussion emphasizes the foundational importance of cross-laboratory replication.

Main Results:

  • Employing random data is essential for accurately assessing the reliability of statistical correction techniques.
  • Excessive faith in any single correction method or threshold can obscure critical scientific principles.
  • Overly conservative thresholds can impede the replication of findings and discourage novel research reporting.

Conclusions:

  • Reliable assessment of statistical correction procedures necessitates the use of random data.
  • A balanced approach is needed, recognizing that replication across different laboratories is paramount.
  • Emphasis on conservative thresholds, especially in fMRI research, may inadvertently stifle innovation and hinder reproducibility.