Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
Microbiological and aMMP-8 findings depending on peri-implant disease in patients undergoing supportive implant
Dirk Ziebolz1, Gerhard Schmalz1, Daniel Gollasch2
1Dept. of Cariology, Endodontology, and Periodontology, University Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to evaluate microbiological findings and aMMP-8 level of peri-implant mucositis (M) and peri-implantitis (P) in patients undergoing supportive implant therapy (SIT). Eighty-nine patients with 171 implants were included. The case definitions were as follows: M: PPD ≥4mm, BOP; P: PPD≥4mm, BOP, radiographic bone loss ≥3.5mm. Samples of peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) were taken from all peri-implant pockets at each implant to detect periodontal pathogens using PCR and aMMP-8 level with ELISA. Only Treponema denticola (Td) and Prevotella intermedia (Pi) showed significantly higher prevalence in P (healthy implants [HI]: Td=27%, Pi=17%; M: Td=26%, Pi=15%; P: Td and Pi=50%; P<0.05). The mean aMMP-8 level at implant sites did not show any significant difference (P=0.05) among HI (5.2±8.1), M (9.9±19.0), and P (4.9±7.7). Microbiological findings and aMMP-8 levels are not reliable criteria to distinguish between HI, M, and P in patients undergoing SIT.
More Related Videos
06:06Adjunctive Diode Laser Therapy and Probiotic Lactobacillus Therapy in the Treatment of Periodontitis and Peri-Implant Disease
Published on: May 9, 2022
04:37Author Spotlight: Advancing Research on Candida albicans Biofilm-Associated Prosthetic Joint Infections
Published on: February 2, 2024