Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

11:38
A Quantitative Glycomics and Proteomics Combined Purification Strategy
Published on: March 8, 2016
15.5K
Purity assessment of ginsenoside Rg1 using quantitative 1H nuclear magnetic resonance
Bao-Ming Huang1, Sheng-Yuan Xiao2, Ting-Bo Chen1
1Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macau, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine (Macau University of Science and Technology), Taipa, Macau, PR China.
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
|March 13, 2017
Summary
Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) accurately measured ginsenoside Rg1 purity, revealing lower levels than manufacturer claims. This highlights qNMR
Area of Science:
- Phytochemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
- Traditional Chinese Medicine
Background:
- Ginseng herbs (Panax ginseng, P. notoginseng, P. quinquefolius) are popular traditional Chinese medicines and natural products.
- Accurate quantification of ginsenoside Rg1 is crucial for quality control.
- High-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) is commonly used but can introduce errors due to detector selectivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To apply quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) for accurate purity assessment of ginsenoside Rg1 chemical reference substance (CRS).
- To compare qNMR results with manufacturer-reported purity and other chromatographic methods.
Main Methods:
- Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) using phenylmethyl phthalate as an internal standard.
- Optimization of qNMR parameters (relaxation delay, scans, windowing) and data processing (Lorentz/Gauss deconvolution).
- Method validation for sensitivity, linearity, precision, and accuracy.
Main Results:
- The developed qNMR method demonstrated acceptable validation parameters.
- The purity of commercial Rg1 CRS was determined to be 90.34±0.21% by qNMR.
- This qNMR-determined purity was significantly lower than the manufacturer's claim (>98.0% by HPLC-UV).
Conclusions:
- qNMR provides a more accurate assessment of Rg1 CRS purity compared to HPLC-UV.
- Common LC-based methods (HPLC-UV, HPLC-ELSD, LC-MS) may overestimate Rg1 CRS purity.
- The accuracy of LC-based methods is influenced by sample loading and impurity properties.

