Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

09:25
Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
Published on: July 26, 2019
7.4K
The effect of face patch microstimulation on perception of faces and objects.
Sebastian Moeller1, Trinity Crapse1, Le Chang1,2
1Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, Computation and Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Nature Neuroscience
|March 14, 2017
Summary
Electrical microstimulation of face patches in the brain distorts face perception. This stimulation also affects perception of non-face objects with face-like shapes, revealing broader visual processing roles.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
- Visual Perception
Background:
- Face-selective regions in the inferotemporal cortex are crucial for recognizing faces.
- The precise range of stimuli processed by these specialized brain areas remains incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how electrical microstimulation of face patches influences the perception of faces and non-face objects.
- To determine the extent to which face-selective regions encode stimuli beyond canonical faces.
Main Methods:
- Electrical microstimulation was applied to face patches in the macaque inferotemporal cortex.
- The effects of stimulation on the perception of faces and various non-face objects were systematically evaluated.
Main Results:
- Microstimulation of face patches significantly distorted perceived facial identity, with effects dependent on precise targeting.
- Perception of certain non-face objects, particularly those with face-consistent shapes (e.g., apples, cartoon houses), was also affected.
- Stimulation impacted the perception of some objects not typically activating the stimulated face patch, suggesting cross-regional influence.
Conclusions:
- Facial identity representation is localized within specific face patches.
- Activity in face patches extends beyond canonical face processing, influencing the perception of face-compatible non-face objects.
- These findings highlight interconnectedness in the inferotemporal cortex for visual object recognition.
Related Concept Videos
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
728
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
728
Association Areas of the Cortex
10.1K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
10.1K

