Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.9K
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

4.7K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
4.7K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

807
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
807
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

112.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
112.6K
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

1.2K
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
1.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring the relationship between vascular remodelling and tumour growth using agent-based modelling.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Therapeutic manipulation and spatial quantification of the tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer.

iScience·2026
Same author

Topological model selection: a case-study in tumour-induced angiogenesis.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

The Role of Fibroblast-Epithelial Cross-Talk on the Distribution of Distinct Fibroblast Phenotypes in the Intestinal Crypt.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same author

The impact of oxygen heterogeneity on epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: a numerical study.

Journal of mathematical biology·2025
Same author

Pharmacological activation of p53 induces dose-dependent changes in endothelial cell fate during angiogenic sprouting.

Cell death & disease·2025
Same journal

Mathematical Modeling Shows that Overall Infection Burden is Reduced More by Vaccines that Decrease Spread or Accelerate Recovery than those that Lower Severe Infections or Death.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Effects of Seasonal Births and Predation on Disease Spread.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Identifiability, Sensitivity, and Genetic Algorithms in Bacterial Biofilm Selection Models.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

Slow Evolution Towards Generalism in a Model of Variable Dietary Range.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

CBINN: Cancer Biology-Informed Neural Network for Unknown Parameter Estimation and Missing Physics Identification.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
Same journal

A Cost-Sensitive Behavioral Modeling Analysis of the Early Identification and Control of Infectious Diseases.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Bayesian Calibration, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification for Predictive Modelling of Tumour Growth: A

Joe Collis1, Anthony J Connor2, Marcin Paczkowski2

  • 1School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Joe.Collis@nottingham.ac.uk.

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
|March 15, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces calibration and validation methods for uncertain tumor growth models. Applying these techniques to a Gompertzian model enhances predictive accuracy for cancer research.

Keywords:
Bayesian calibrationModel validationTumour growth

More Related Videos

Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography
09:53

Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.8K
Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography
09:53

Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.8K
Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Mathematical Biology
  • Computational Oncology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Tumor growth modeling is crucial for understanding cancer progression.
  • Gompertzian models are widely used but often lack robust uncertainty quantification.
  • Calibration and validation techniques are not commonly applied in cancer modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a pedagogical example of applying calibration and validation to an uncertain Gompertzian tumor spheroid growth model.
  • To demonstrate the utility of these methods in the context of cancer modeling.
  • To propose a learning approach for optimizing model validation.

Main Methods:

  • Calibration of an uncertain Gompertzian model using experimental data with measurement errors.
  • Validation of the calibrated uncertain model predictions.
  • Sensitivity analysis of model predictions to the measurement model.
  • Development of an elementary learning approach for threshold parameter tuning.

Main Results:

  • Successful application of calibration and validation techniques to an uncertain tumor growth model.
  • Demonstrated sensitivity of model predictions to measurement error models.
  • Proposed a method to enhance predictive accuracy through parameter tuning in validation.

Conclusions:

  • Calibration and validation are valuable, underutilized tools for uncertain cancer models.
  • Understanding measurement error is critical for accurate tumor growth prediction.
  • An adaptive learning approach can improve the reliability of validated tumor growth models.