Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bone Remodeling01:40

Bone Remodeling

40.8K
Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.
40.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Sintering Parameters on the Microstructure and Optical Transmittance of Monolithic 4 mol% Yttria-Partially Stabilized Zirconia.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Clinical outcomes of implant-assisted removable partial dentures in patients with disabilities: a retrospective cohort study.

BMC oral health·2026
Same author

Effect of Supervised Versus Hybrid Delivery of Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026
Same author

Prediction and risk factor analysis of dental implant failure using Cox regression and machine learning.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same author

Biofilm comes back: Controlling regrowth by mitigating the cell-matrix interaction.

Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996)·2025
Same author

The effects of fabrication methods and build orientation on Candida albicans adhesion on 3D-printed and conventional denture resin: an in vitro comparative study.

BMC oral health·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

13.4K

Osteoclastic Response on Titanium Surfaces in Modified Simulated Body Fluid.

Moon-Hyoung Kim, Su-Young Lee, Seong-Joo Heo

    The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
    |March 15, 2017
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study explored how calcium phosphate (CaP) coatings on titanium surfaces affect osteoclast activity. Researchers prepared two types of titanium surfaces—machined and anodic oxidized—and immersed them in a simulated body fluid for 14 days. They used mouse cells to model osteoclasts and measured their activity through TRAP assays and gene expression. The results showed that CaP deposition reduced osteoclast differentiation, especially on anodic oxidized surfaces. The study suggests that surface type and CaP coatings may influence osteoclast behavior, potentially improving implant integration by suppressing bone resorption.

    Keywords:
    titanium surface modificationosteoclast differentiationsimulated body fluidbone resorption inhibition

    Frequently Asked Questions

    More Related Videos

    Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
    11:19

    Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

    Published on: June 24, 2018

    12.3K
    Platelet-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Functionalization of Ti Implants
    04:16

    Platelet-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Functionalization of Ti Implants

    Published on: August 5, 2021

    2.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

    Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
    10:28

    Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

    Published on: November 16, 2018

    13.4K
    Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
    11:19

    Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

    Published on: June 24, 2018

    12.3K
    Platelet-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Functionalization of Ti Implants
    04:16

    Platelet-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Functionalization of Ti Implants

    Published on: August 5, 2021

    2.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Dental materials research in biomedical engineering
    • Osteoclast biology within bone regeneration studies

    Background:

    It was already known that titanium surfaces influence bone cell behavior, but the impact on osteoclast activity remained unclear. Researchers had studied how surface modifications affect osteoblasts, but osteoclast responses were less explored. Surface hydrophilicity had been linked to improved bone integration, yet its role in suppressing osteoclast activity was unproven. No prior work had resolved whether biomimetic CaP coatings could reduce osteoclast differentiation. This gap motivated the current study to evaluate how CaP deposition affects osteoclastogenesis. The uncertainty around surface-specific effects on osteoclasts drove the need for comparative analysis. Previous studies had not directly compared machined and anodic oxidized surfaces in this context. This study aimed to clarify whether surface type and immersion in simulated body fluid alter osteoclast behavior.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The aim was to determine how biomimetic CaP deposition affects osteoclast differentiation on titanium surfaces. Researchers focused on whether surface hydrophilicity and CaP layers could suppress osteoclastogenesis. The study compared two titanium surfaces: machined and anodic oxidized. Both surfaces were immersed in modified simulated body fluid for 14 days. The goal was to assess whether CaP deposition influences osteoclast activity. The researchers wanted to evaluate surface-specific effects on osteoclast differentiation. They sought to measure changes in key transcription factors involved in osteoclastogenesis. The study aimed to clarify if biomimetic treatment could reduce osteoclast formation.

    Main Methods:

    Ti discs with machined and anodic oxidized surfaces were prepared for the experiment. Specimens were soaked in modified simulated body fluid for 14 days. Murine RAW 264.7 cells were used as osteoclast precursors for testing. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity was measured to assess differentiation. FE-SEM was used to observe osteoclast morphology on Ti surfaces. mRNA and protein levels of NFATc1 and c-Fos were analyzed using RT-PCR and western blot. Surface characteristics were compared between immersed and nonimmersed groups. The study focused on how surface type and CaP deposition affect osteoclastogenesis.

    Main Results:

    TRAP activity was significantly lower on both surfaces after immersion in simulated body fluid. FE-SEM showed fewer differentiated osteoclasts on anodic oxidized surfaces after immersion. NFATc1 and c-Fos mRNA levels were reduced on anodic oxidized surfaces after treatment. Protein expression of NFATc1 and c-Fos also decreased on anodic oxidized surfaces. The suppression of osteoclastogenesis was greater on anodic oxidized surfaces than on machined ones. Immersion in simulated body fluid led to reduced osteoclast differentiation on both surfaces. The effect was more pronounced on anodic oxidized surfaces compared to machined ones. These findings suggest that CaP deposition influences osteoclast behavior in a surface-dependent manner.

    Conclusions:

    The study suggests that biomimetic CaP deposition may suppress osteoclastogenesis on titanium surfaces. The effect appears to be more significant on anodic oxidized surfaces than on machined ones. The reduction in TRAP activity supports the idea that CaP layers influence osteoclast differentiation. Lower expression of NFATc1 and c-Fos indicates reduced osteoclastogenic signaling. The findings suggest that surface hydrophilicity and CaP deposition may work together to inhibit osteoclasts. The results may imply that anodic oxidized surfaces are more effective in this context. The study supports the hypothesis that CaP deposition contributes to reduced osteoclast activity. These findings may help guide surface modification strategies for dental implants.

    The study found that biomimetic CaP deposition reduced osteoclast differentiation, especially on anodic oxidized surfaces.

    RAW 264.7 cells were used as a model for osteoclast precursors to evaluate differentiation on titanium surfaces.

    To assess how surface type affects the suppression of osteoclastogenesis after CaP deposition.

    These transcription factors were measured to evaluate changes in osteoclastogenic signaling pathways.

    TRAP activity and FE-SEM observations were used to assess osteoclast differentiation on titanium surfaces.

    The results suggest that anodic oxidized surfaces with CaP deposition may help reduce osteoclast activity.