Measurement properties and normative data for the Norwegian SF-36: results from a general population survey
A M Garratt1, K Stavem2,3,4
1Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404, Nydalen, N-0403, Oslo, Norway. andrew.garratt@fhi.no.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
|March 16, 2017
Summary
This study provides updated normative data for the SF-36 Health Survey in Norway, showing good measurement properties for current use in health services research. The findings offer more recent and comprehensive data than previous 1996 Norwegian population norms.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Psychometrics
- Population Health
Background:
- Current interpretation of the SF-36 in Norway relies on 1996 data.
- This study presents updated 2002-2003 general population data for the SF-36.
- The measurement properties of this updated dataset needed assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the measurement properties of the Norwegian SF-36 version 1.2 using 2002-2003 general population data.
- To provide updated normative data for the SF-36 in Norway.
- To evaluate the suitability of this data for health services research.
Main Methods:
- A postal survey of 9,164 Norwegians aged 16+ (response rate 58.9%) using the SF-36.
- Assessment of data completeness, item-total correlations, and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha).
- Analysis of floor and ceiling effects, and generation of normative data by age and gender.
Main Results:
- High data completeness (97.5-99.8%) and scale reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8).
- Item-total correlations generally > 0.4, with expected variations.
- Floor effects were low except for Role-Physical; high ceiling effects observed for Role-Physical and Role-Emotional. Females generally scored lower than males. Younger groups scored higher on physical health aspects; older groups showed varied scores for mental health aspects.
Conclusions:
- The 2002-2003 SF-36 data meet criteria for normative data application.
- This dataset is more recent, larger, and includes more older individuals than the 1996 data.
- The updated data can enhance the interpretation of SF-36 scores in clinical and health services research.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
1.1K
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
1.1K
Introduction to Normal Distributions
107
Standardized test scores often follow a symmetric distribution that can be modeled with the normal distribution, a fundamental concept in statistics. This distribution is particularly useful for interpreting test performance fairly across populations, as it provides a mathematical framework for understanding variability and central tendency in large datasets.From Histogram to Frequency DistributionRaw test data are often displayed using histograms, where the height of each bar represents the...
107
Nominal Level of Measurement
40.9K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. Not every statistical operation can be used with every set of data. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal...
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal...
40.9K
Measures of Central Tendency
22.5K
The "center" of a data set is also a way of describing location. The two most widely used measures of the "center" of the data are the mean (average) and the median. The words "mean" and "average" are often used interchangeably. The substitution of one word for the other is common practice. The technical term is "arithmetic mean" and "average" is technically a center location. However, in practice among non-statisticians,...
22.5K
Ordinal Level of Measurement
35.9K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
35.9K
Measurement: Standard Units
84.1K
Every measurement provides three kinds of information: the size or magnitude of the measurement (a number), a standard of comparison for the measurement (a unit), and an indication of the uncertainty of the measurement. While the number and unit are explicitly represented when a quantity is written, the uncertainty is an aspect of the errors in the measurement results.
84.1K


