Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

441
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
441
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

43.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
43.8K
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

1.0K
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
1.0K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.5K
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

827
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
827
Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

547
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
547

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Grandfather Clauses and Medical Transition-Proposed CMS Rules Should Consider Exceptions.

JAMA pediatrics·2026
Same author

How variants of uncertain significance affect clinical decisions: A systematic review.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same author

Stakeholder views about the responsibilities of principal investigators in multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Response to Sansom et al.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same author

Germline Cancer Predisposition Results From the National Cancer Institute-Children's Oncology Group Pediatric MATCH Trial.

JCO precision oncology·2025
Same author

Holistic care, the therapeutic misconception and the puberty blocker trial: response to Giordano.

Journal of medical ethics·2025
Same journal

Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

The Hastings Center report·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Justifying Clinical Nudges.

Moti Gorin, Steven Joffe, Neal Dickert

    The Hastings Center Report
    |March 17, 2017
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Clinical nudges, subtle choice influences, can ethically guide patient decisions. Justification shifts from patient preferences to a professional best-interest standard for moral soundness.

    More Related Videos

    Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
    07:14

    Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

    Published on: December 23, 2025

    182
    A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
    08:01

    A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli

    Published on: August 12, 2016

    9.5K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

    Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
    07:07

    Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

    Published on: June 5, 2016

    9.3K
    Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
    07:14

    Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models

    Published on: December 23, 2025

    182
    A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
    08:01

    A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli

    Published on: August 12, 2016

    9.5K

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Behavioral Economics
    • Medical Decision-Making

    Background:

    • Shift from paternalistic to patient-centered care emphasizes patient values.
    • Choice presentation significantly influences decision-making.
    • Behavioral economics identifies predictable choice effects from presentation features.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the ethical justification of clinical nudges.
    • To evaluate the role of patient preferences versus professional standards in justifying nudges.
    • To propose the best-interest standard as a robust ethical framework for clinical nudges.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of ethical principles in shared decision-making.
    • Examination of behavioral economics findings on choice architecture.
    • Application of the best-interest standard to clinical nudges.

    Main Results:

    • Conscious efforts to influence choice (nudges) can be morally justified.
    • Justifying nudges based solely on patient preferences is problematic.
    • The best-interest standard provides a strong ethical basis for clinical nudges.

    Conclusions:

    • Clinical nudges can ethically support patient decision-making.
    • Physicians should ground nudge justifications in professional standards, not just patient preferences.
    • The best-interest standard offers a reliable ethical framework for implementing clinical nudges.