Sources of variation in rapidly inducible responses to leaf damage in the mountain birch-insect herbivore system

Studies on rapidly inducible resistance in trees against insect herbivores show substantial variation in the strength of responses. Here we report the results of a study which examined causes of this variation. We bioassayed the quality of leaves of two developmental phases (young vs. mature) of the mountain birch Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa by measuring the growth of two instars of Epirrita autumnata larvae. We used only short shoot leaves from trees of a natural stand, uniform in size and age. Damage was caused by larvae and artificial tearing of leaf lamina, varying the scale and time. We separated seasonal changes in plants from instar-dependent effects of the animals by testing experimental larvae in two subsequent growth trials. We found that only larval-made damage induced responses in leaves that made the leaves significantly poorer quality for the test larvae. Artificial damage induced only weak responses, and artificial canopy-wide damage even caused slight improvement of leaf quality. Cumulative leaf damage did not strengthen birch responses. Leaves that were in the expansion phase responded to damage while fully-expanded, mature leaves showed no response. The pattern of responses indicated that there might be physiological constraints: small-scale damage induced resistance against the larvae but largescale damage did not. Prevalent weather conditions might have modified these responses. Larvae of two instars and sexes, of low- and high-density populations responded to leaf damage similarly. However, prior experience of larvae with the host plant may have affected subsequent larval performance. Variation in rapidly inducible responses in birches was caused by plant characters rather than by test animals.