Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Time takes space: selective effects of multitasking on concurrent spatial processing.

Timo Mäntylä¹, Valentina Coni², Veit Kubik³

¹Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. timo.mantyla@psychology.su.se.

Cognitive Processing

|March 20, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Unveiling memory's role in the hindsight bias: A relative accessibility account.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same author

Curiosity in a Novel Virtual Reality Scenario and Its Association With Symptoms of Depression: Observational Pilot Investigation.

JMIR formative research·2026

Same author

Get the unbalance right: asymmetric transfer effects in cognitive offloading.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026

Same author

Identifying the 50 most productive researchers in top-tier, broad-scope educational psychology journals (2017-2022): a new perspective with a focus on publication trends and diversity.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same author

Analyzing the large and complex SFARI autism cohort data using the Genotypes and Phenotypes in Families (GPF) platform.

Genome research·2025

Same author

Acceptability, Usability, and Insights Into Cybersickness Levels of a Novel Virtual Reality Environment for the Evaluation of Depressive Symptoms: Exploratory Observational Study.

JMIR formative research·2025

Efficient multitasking relies on transforming time into spatial representations, specifically metric (coordinate) spatial processing. This study found that multitasking taxes coordinate spatial skills, with males outperforming females.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

Everyday activities often involve managing multiple future goals and deadlines, necessitating complex cognitive control.
Cognitive offloading, using external representations like spatial patterns, can reduce mental workload.
The role of spatial processing in multitasking, particularly the transformation of temporal information, remains an active area of research.

Purpose of the Study:

To test the hypothesis that multiple-task monitoring involves time-to-space transformational processes.
To investigate whether these spatial effects are selective, favoring coordinate (metric) over categorical (nonmetric) spatial relation processing.
To examine potential sex differences in multitasking performance.

Main Methods:

Keywords:

Cognitive offloading Multitasking Spatial relation processing Time monitoring

Related Experiment Videos

Participants engaged in a multitasking session involving monitoring four deadline series across different time scales.
Concurrent spatial judgment tasks, differentiating between coordinate and categorical spatial relations, were performed.
Multitasking performance was assessed in relation to the concurrent spatial processing demands.

Main Results:

Multitasking significantly taxed concurrent coordinate (metric) spatial processing.
Multitasking did not significantly affect concurrent categorical (nonmetric) spatial processing.
Males demonstrated superior multitasking performance compared to females.

Conclusions:

Efficient multitasking appears to involve metric relational processing, specifically the transformation of temporal information into spatial representations.
The findings support a selective spatial processing mechanism in multitasking, highlighting the importance of coordinate spatial skills.
Sex differences in multitasking efficiency may be linked to variations in metric spatial processing capabilities.