Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Impact01:30

Types of Impact

1.1K
Impacts can be classified in various forms, primarily under two subgroups: central impact and oblique impact. A central impact occurs when two objects collide head-on, possessing opposite velocities aligned along the line of impact. Conversely, an oblique impact occurs when two objects collide at an angle, resulting in a modification of both direction and velocity.
The coefficient of restitution is a metric for understanding the dynamics of impacts. It quantifies the ratio of relative velocity...
1.1K
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

17.5K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
17.5K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

510
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
510
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.2K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.2K
Statgraphics01:10

Statgraphics

446
Statgraphics is a comprehensive statistical software suite designed for both basic and advanced data analysis. Originating in 1980 at Princeton University under Dr. Neil W. Polhemus, it was one of the pioneering tools for statistical computing on personal computers, with its public release in 1982 marking an early milestone in data science software. Over the years, it has evolved into a robust platform for data science, offering tools for regression analysis, ANOVA, multivariate statistics,...
446
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

39.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

World neurosurgery·2017
Same author

Development of the AOSpine Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma (AOSpine PROST): a universal disease-specific outcome instrument for individuals with traumatic spinal column injury.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2017
Same author

The Role of Multimodal Analgesia in Spine Surgery.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2017
Same author

Evidence-Based Recommendations for Spine Surgery.

Spine·2017
Same author

Does Medicaid Insurance Confer Adequate Access to Adult Orthopaedic Care in the Era of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2017
Same author

Value-based Insurance Design.

Clinical spine surgery·2017
Same journal

Less Is More! An Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes Comparing Low-Dose E. Coli-Derived rhBMP-2 and Mammalian rhBMP-2 in Lateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery.

Clinical spine surgery·2026
Same journal

Preoperative Distal Motor Latency Testing and Long-Term Outcomes in Combined Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Analysis of Diagnostic Discordance.

Clinical spine surgery·2026
Same journal

Differential Mechanisms of Ligamentum Flavum Hypertrophy: A Comparative MRI Analysis of Lumbar Spine Degeneration Patterns.

Clinical spine surgery·2026
Same journal

Discrepancy Between Global-Specific and Disease-Specific Outcome Measures Following Cervical Spine Surgery.

Clinical spine surgery·2026
Same journal

A Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification Does Not Correlate With Inferior Outcomes Following Cervical Disk Replacement.

Clinical spine surgery·2026
Same journal

A Break-Even Cost Analysis for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Clinical spine surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.8K

Understanding Traditional Research Impact Metrics.

Joseph S Butler1, Arjun S Sebastian, I David Kaye

  • 1Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

Clinical Spine Surgery
|March 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Traditional research metrics like Impact Factor have limitations. No single metric perfectly captures research impact, necessitating careful selection by academics and researchers.

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

34.1K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.8K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

34.1K
Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scholarly Communication
  • Research Evaluation

Background:

  • Historically, researcher success was measured by publication count in high-impact journals.
  • Traditional metrics like Impact Factor, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), Eigenfactor Score, and Article Influence Score (AIS) are used to quantify research impact.
  • These metrics aim to assess scholarly output and influence within the scientific community.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of traditional metrics for assessing research impact.
  • To highlight the advantages and limitations of existing bibliometric tools.
  • To guide researchers in the judicious selection of metrics for evaluating scholarly work.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of established bibliometric indicators.
  • Analysis of the scope and application of traditional research impact metrics.
  • Discussion of the inherent strengths and weaknesses of each metric.

Main Results:

  • No single traditional metric can comprehensively measure all facets of research impact.
  • Existing metrics offer valuable insights but have inherent limitations.
  • A nuanced understanding of these metrics is crucial for accurate research assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Academics and researchers must be aware of the pros and cons of traditional metrics.
  • Judicious selection of appropriate metrics is essential for objective scholarly output assessment.
  • The complexity of research impact necessitates a multi-faceted evaluation approach beyond single metrics.