Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect
M Hassan Murad1, Reem A Mustafa2,3, Holger J Schünemann3
1Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Abstract:
When studies measure or report outcomes differently, it may not be feasible to pool data across studies to generate a single effect estimate (ie, perform meta-analysis). Instead, only a narrative summary of the effect across different studies might be available. Regardless of whether a single pooled effect estimate is generated or whether data are summarised narratively, decision makers need to know the certainty in the evidence in order to make informed decisions. In this guide, we illustrate how to apply the constructs of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the certainty in evidence when a meta-analysis has not been performed and data were summarised narratively.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Uncertainty: Overview
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Margin of Error
Confidence Intervals
A...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

