Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 5, 2026

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
Published on: February 6, 2021
Nursing judgement and decision-making using the Sedation Withdrawal Score (SWS) in children
Jennie Craske1,2, Bernie Carter3,4,5, Ian H Jarman6
1Department of Anaesthetics, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Insights
Registered children
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care nursing
- Clinical decision-making in pediatric nursing
- Childhood withdrawal syndrome assessment
Background:
- Assessing withdrawal syndrome in critically ill children presents challenges due to unstable conditions and differential diagnoses.
- Standardized assessment tools are crucial for recognizing withdrawal syndrome, but nurses' decision-making processes in these complex situations are not well understood.
- Cognitive effort is required for accurate assessment and management of withdrawal syndrome in pediatric patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate how registered children's nurses approach the assessment and management of withdrawal syndrome in pediatric patients.
- To explore the cognitive processes nurses employ when using the Sedation Withdrawal Score (SWS) tool.
- To understand the decision-making challenges faced by nurses during withdrawal assessments in critical care settings.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study employing cognitive interviews with 12 registered children's nurses.
- Utilized clinical vignettes to explore nurses' decision-making processes when assessing withdrawal.
- Interviews focused on the application of the Sedation Withdrawal Score (SWS) tool in pediatric critical care.
Main Results:
- Nurses experienced cognitive challenges at all decision-making stages: noticing, interpreting, and responding to withdrawal signs.
- Difficulty in distinguishing between Sedation Withdrawal Score (SWS) signs and attributing behaviors to withdrawal versus comorbidities was common.
- Variability in diagnoses and treatment responses occurred, particularly when nurses were uncertain about the cause of a child's behavior.
Conclusions:
- Cognitive interviews revealed insights into nurses' judgment and decision-making complexities in pediatric withdrawal assessment.
- The Sedation Withdrawal Score (SWS) may not fully standardize assessment due to contextual complexities and difficulties in determining the cause of ambiguous behaviors.
- Further research is needed to improve standardized assessment and management of withdrawal syndrome in critically ill children.
Aims:
The aim of the study was to evaluate registered children's nurses' approaches to the assessment and management of withdrawal syndrome in children.
Background:
Assessment of withdrawal syndrome is undertaken following critical illness when the child's condition may be unstable with competing differential diagnoses. Assessment tools aim to standardize and improve recognition of withdrawal syndrome. Making the right decisions in complex clinical situations requires a degree of mental effort and it is not known how nurses make decisions when undertaking withdrawal assessments.
Design:
Cognitive interviews with clinical vignettes.
Methods:
Interviews were undertaken with 12 nurses to explore the cognitive processes they used when assessing children using the Sedation Withdrawal Score (SWS) tool. Interviews took place in Autumn 2013.
Findings:
Each stage of decision-making-noticing, interpreting and responding-presented cognitive challenges for nurses. When defining withdrawal behaviours nurses tended to blur the boundaries between Sedation Withdrawal Score signs. Challenges in interpreting behaviours arose from not knowing if the patient's behaviour was a result of withdrawal or other co-morbidities. Nurses gave a range of diagnoses when interpreting the vignettes, despite being provided with identical information. Treatment responses corresponded to definite withdrawal diagnoses, but varied when nurses were unsure of the diagnosis.
Conclusion:
Cognitive interviews with vignettes provided insight into nurses' judgement and decision-making. The SWS does not standardize the assessment of withdrawal due to the complexity of the context where assessments take place and the difficulties of determining the cause of equivocal behaviours in children recovering from critical illness.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Stages of General Anesthesia
Sedatives and Hypnotics: Overview
Sedative-hypnotics are categorized into barbiturates, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and non-benzodiazepines or Z-drugs. These drugs work by suppressing central nervous system activity, and this suppression is dose-dependent. Older sedative medications, like barbiturates, follow a linear curve in...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Miscellaneous Agents
Melatonin congeners like ramelteon (Rozerem) and tasimelteon (Hetlioz) selectively bind to melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) and thus mimic the actions of melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep-wake cycles. Tasimelteon is primarily used for non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, common in blind patients. They are also used to treat conditions like insomnia...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
