Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
Practical no-gold-standard evaluation framework for quantitative imaging methods: application to lesion segmentation
Abhinav K Jha1, Esther Mena1, Brian Caffo2
1Johns Hopkins University , Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
No-gold-standard (NGS) techniques evaluate imaging precision using patient data. This study introduces statistical tests and bootstrap methods to improve NGS reliability and address practical challenges in quantitative imaging analysis.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Quantitative Imaging Analysis
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
Background:
- No-gold-standard (NGS) techniques offer a way to assess quantitative imaging precision without gold standards or repeated measurements.
- Practical application of NGS methods to patient data faces challenges in assumption assessment, sampling uncertainty, and reliability evaluation.
- Evaluating lesion segmentation in F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) PET for head-and-neck cancer requires precise metabolic tumor volume measurement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop statistical tests and a bootstrap-based methodology to enhance the reliability and address practical difficulties of NGS techniques.
- To provide confidence in the underlying assumptions and the reliability of estimated figures of merit (FoMs) from NGS.
- To evaluate four lesion segmentation methods for metabolic tumor volume measurement in head-and-neck cancer using FDG-PET data.
Main Methods:
- Proposed statistical tests to validate NGS assumptions and the reliability of estimated FoMs.
- Integrated NGS with a bootstrap-based methodology to account for patient-sampling uncertainty.
- Applied the developed NGS framework to segment lesions from FDG-PET images of head-and-neck cancer patients.
Main Results:
- The NGS technique consistently identified the same segmentation method as the most precise.
- The proposed framework provided reliable results even without gold-standard data.
- Bootstrap analysis showed improved NGS performance with more patient studies and consistent results with over 80 lesions.
Conclusions:
- The developed NGS framework enhances the reliability of quantitative imaging method evaluation using patient data.
- The methodology provides confidence in assessing imaging precision, particularly for metabolic tumor volume in head-and-neck cancer.
- The approach is robust and improves with larger datasets, offering a valuable tool for quantitative imaging research.
More Related Videos
09:21Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images
Published on: February 18, 2015
09:55Radiosynthesis, Quality Control, and Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of 68Ga-Labelled Nano Molecules
Published on: October 4, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET