Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

EXPRESS: The Effect of Response-code on Stroop Interference and Facilitation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Is "sky" bluer than "grass" is green? Word-color associations dataset for cognitive science.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

The illusion of numerical value.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Linguistic experiential priors account for notation-dependent numerical representations.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Irrelevant Task Difficulty Modulates the Emergence of Task Conflict.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

A novel task for measuring numerical bias among adults.

Cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.7K

Adjustment of control in the numerical Stroop task.

Gal Dadon1, Avishai Henik2

  • 1Department of Psychology and the Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel. galaza@post.bgu.ac.il.

Memory & Cognition
|March 25, 2017
PubMed
Summary

In the numerical Stroop task, participants struggle to ignore irrelevant information, showing control adjustment is bidirectional and depends on task demands. Inhibiting irrelevant information may be easier than inhibiting task activation.

Keywords:
Adjustment of controlInformational conflictNumerical Stroop taskProportion congruencyTask conflict

More Related Videos

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

41.5K
Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.7K
The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

41.5K
Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-computer interaction

Background:

  • The numerical Stroop task demonstrates cognitive interference when irrelevant information (e.g., physical size) conflicts with the relevant dimension (e.g., numerical value).
  • Previous research suggests an asymmetry in adjusting cognitive control between physical and numerical tasks within the Stroop paradigm.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the asymmetry in cognitive control adjustment between physical and numerical Stroop tasks.
  • To examine how control adjustment resolves task-related and informational conflicts.
  • To explore the bidirectional nature of control adjustment based on experimental demands.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using the numerical Stroop task.
  • The proportion of neutral/congruent trials within experimental blocks was manipulated.
  • Interference and facilitation effects were measured to assess cognitive control.

Main Results:

  • Cognitive control adjustment was found to be bidirectional, varying with specific task requirements.
  • The ability to inhibit irrelevant information appears more efficient than inhibiting irrelevant task activation.
  • Evidence supports the hypothesis of asymmetric control adjustment capabilities in different task contexts.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive control adjustment is a dynamic process influenced by task demands and trial types.
  • The findings suggest distinct mechanisms for inhibiting perceptual information versus task-set activation.
  • Future research should further explore the neural underpinnings of this asymmetric control.