Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
Proportional Recovery From Lower Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke
Marie-Claire Smith1, Winston D Byblow1, P Alan Barber1
1From the Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand (M.-C.S., P.A.B., C.M.S.); Centre for Brain Research (M.-C.S., W.D.B., P.A.B., C.M.S.) and Department of Exercise Sciences (W.D.B.), University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Background And Purpose:
In people with preserved corticospinal tract (CST) function after stroke, upper limb impairment resolves by ≈70% within 3 months. This is known as the proportional recovery rule. Patients without CST function do not fit this rule and have worse upper limb outcomes. This study investigated resolution of motor impairment in the lower limb (LL).
Methods:
Patients with stroke and LL weakness were assessed 3 days and 3 months after stroke with the LL Fugl-Meyer. CST integrity was determined in a subset of patients using transcranial magnetic stimulation to test for LL motor-evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging to measure CST lesion load. Linear regression analyses were conducted to predict resolution of motor impairment (ΔFugl-Meyer) including factors initial impairment, motor-evoked potential status, CST lesion load, and LL therapy dose.
Results:
Thirty-two patients completed 3-month follow-up and recovered 74% (95% confidence interval, 60%-88%) of initial LL motor impairment. Initial impairment was the only significant predictor of resolution of motor impairment. There was no identifiable cluster of patients who did not fit the proportional recovery rule. Measures of CST integrity did not predict proportional LL recovery.
Conclusions:
LL impairment resolves by ≈70% within 3 months after stroke. The absence of a nonfitter group may be because of differences in the neuroanatomical organization of descending motor tracts to the upper limb and LL. Proportional recovery of the LL is not influenced by therapy dose providing further evidence that it reflects a fundamental biological process.
More Related Videos
04:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes
Published on: September 6, 2024
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024