Getting satisfied with "satisfaction of search": How to measure errors during multiple-target visual search
1Naval Medical Research Unit Dayton, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 2624 Q Street, Bldg. 851, Area B, Fairborn, OH, 45433, USA. adam.biggs.1@us.af.mil.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|March 30, 2017
Summary
Multiple target visual search introduces errors after a target is found. This study reviews measurement methods for these subsequent search errors and provides guidelines for future research.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human Perception
- Visual Cognition
Background:
- Visual search studies commonly measure accuracy and response times.
- Most research focuses on single-target search, overlooking errors in multiple-target scenarios.
- Subsequent search errors, occurring after a target is found, are a significant issue in multiple-target search.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify appropriate scenarios for observing subsequent search errors.
- To compare different measurement methods for subsequent search errors.
- To provide guidelines for measuring multiple-target search errors.
Main Methods:
- Literature review to identify scenarios for subsequent search errors.
- Application of various measurement methods to existing datasets.
- Comparative analysis of how different methods impact results and conclusions.
Main Results:
- Identified specific scenarios where subsequent search errors are relevant.
- Demonstrated significant differences in study outcomes based on measurement methods.
- Provided empirical evidence for the impact of measurement choices.
Conclusions:
- Standardized measurement of subsequent search errors is crucial for reliable findings.
- Guidelines are proposed to ensure consistency and validity in future research.
- This work aims to advance the understanding of complex visual search behavior.


