Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Cost of Structure Learning.

Anne G E Collins1

  • 1University of California, Berkeley.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|March 31, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans flexibly learn by creating hierarchical structures, even when not required. This structure learning offers long-term generalization benefits but incurs significant short-term costs, including slower learning and more errors.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Latent subdimensions of anxiety and depression differentially influence exertion of effort in pursuit of reward versus avoidance of threat.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Latent Learning Progress Drives Autonomous Goal Selection in Human Reinforcement Learning.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2025
Same author

A habit and working memory model as an alternative account of human reward-based learning.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Linking reinforcement learning, working memory, and choice dynamics to age and symptoms of anxiety and depression in adolescence.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Dual process impairments in reinforcement learning and working memory systems underlie learning deficits in physiological anxiety.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Dual effects of dual-tasking on instrumental learning.

Cognition·2025
Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational modeling

Background:

  • Human learning is characterized by flexibility and efficiency, enabling generalization and rule transfer across contexts.
  • This flexibility is thought to arise from hierarchical structuring of information into abstract, context-dependent rules.
  • Previous research suggests humans form such structures even when not immediately necessary, anticipating long-term benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the predicted costs of structure learning in human behavior.
  • To test whether creating abstract hierarchical structures incurs a learning cost, as suggested by computational models.
  • To determine if this cost is associated with rule selection and application.

Main Methods:

  • A behavioral experiment was designed to compare structure learning with nonhierarchical learning.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants learned action selection for visual patterns in conditions that either allowed or enforced nonhierarchical learning.
  • Learning difficulty was controlled, and reaction times (RTs) and error rates were measured.

    • Main Results:

    • Results confirmed that healthy young adults form abstract structures even when not required, supporting earlier findings.
    • The study supported the prediction that structure learning imposes a significant learning cost.
    • This cost was specifically linked to the effort in selecting abstract rules, leading to increased errors during rule application.

    Conclusions:

    • Human structure learning, while beneficial for long-term flexibility and generalization, comes at a substantial short-term cost.
    • This cost is evident in slower learning and increased errors associated with the selection and application of abstract rules.
    • The findings validate a theoretical framework where short-term learning costs are traded for long-term gains in cognitive flexibility.