Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Breaking the rules in perceptual information integration.

Maxim A Bushmakin1, Ami Eidels2, Andrew Heathcote3

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, USA; Volen National Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, USA.

Cognitive Psychology
|April 10, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Positive Bias in Value-Based Decision Making: Neurocognitive Associations with Resilience.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

An illustrative guide to expressing cognitive theories using evidence accumulation modelling.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Joint Cognitive Models Reveal Sources of Robust Individual Differences in Conflict Processing.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

The diffusion model's drift rate parameter primarily reflects efficiency, rather than speed, of evidence accumulation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Bayesian hierarchical cognitive modeling with the EMC2 package.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Comparing the reliability of individual differences for various measurement models in conflict tasks.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new framework for understanding perceptual information integration, finding that logical decision rules, not coactive ones, best explain how people process sensory data, especially when rules are occasionally broken.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Perceptual information integration is crucial for decision-making.
  • Existing models often struggle to account for complex decision rules and human error.
  • Understanding how individuals integrate sensory information under various decision rules is key.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a theoretical framework for modeling perceptual information integration tasks.
  • To compare coactive and parallel architectures under different decision rules.
  • To test hypotheses regarding rule-breaking and the influence of decision rules on evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a theoretical framework for perceptual information integration.
  • Modeled coactive and parallel architectures, incorporating decision rules and response times.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tested models against empirical data from a perceptual integration task with near-threshold stimuli.

    • Main Results:

    • The coactive architecture was rejected in favor of parallel architectures using logical rules.
    • Logical-rule models accurately predicted observed data, including speed-accuracy tradeoffs and response biases.
    • Model performance improved significantly when allowing for rule-breaking and response bias.

    Conclusions:

    • Parallel architectures with logical rules provide a superior account of perceptual information integration.
    • Human decision-making in perceptual tasks often involves deviations from strict rules.
    • The developed framework offers a flexible approach for analyzing complex decision processes.