Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confidence Intervals for Asbestos Fiber Counts: Approximate Negative Binomial Distribution.

David Bartley1, James Slaven2, Martin Harper3

  • 1Consultant, 3904 Pocahontas Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45227, USA.

Annals of Work Exposures and Health
|April 11, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The basis for recommending the selection of samplers in determining occupational exposures to aerosols.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2026
Same author

Polysomnographic insights into the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and obstructive sleep apnea connection in children.

Frontiers in sleep·2025
Same author

Ensuring Quality in Interventional Cytopathology.

Acta cytologica·2025
Same author

Acute Alcohol Intoxication and Chronic Alcohol Use Increase Risk of Infection After Open Tibia Fractures.

Orthopedics·2025
Same author

Recommended flow rate of the aluminum cyclone for improved exposure assessment.

Annals of work exposures and health·2025
Same author

Pragmatic trial of a virtual dementia collaborative care management program: protocol for the Aging Brain Care Virtual (ABCV) program.

BMJ open·2025

This study introduces a negative binomial distribution model for asbestos fiber counts, improving accuracy by accounting for sampling and human variation. The developed approximation provides reliable quantiles and confidence limits for asbestos analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Occupational Health
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Asbestos fiber counting is crucial for occupational health risk assessment.
  • Existing methods face challenges due to sampling errors and human variability.
  • Accurate statistical analysis is needed to address these limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To adopt the negative binomial distribution for asbestos fiber count analysis.
  • To develop a simple approximation for quantiles and confidence limits.
  • To improve the accuracy of asbestos exposure assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the negative binomial distribution to model asbestos fiber counts.
  • Developed a novel approximation using Stirling's expansion and inverse-trapezoidal integration.
Keywords:
asbestosfiber counting quality controlnegative binomial confidence

Related Experiment Videos

  • Validated the approximation through simulation and comparison with Poisson distribution scenarios.

    • Main Results:

    • The approximation accurately derives quantiles and confidence limits for asbestos fiber counts.
    • The method accounts for both sampling errors and human variation in fiber identification.
    • Derived statistics relate to historical asbestos sampling accuracy research.

    Conclusions:

    • The negative binomial approximation offers a robust method for asbestos fiber analysis.
    • Improved estimation of mean asbestos fiber concentrations and uncertainty is achieved.
    • Decision and detection limits are refined for better control of false-positive/negative assertions.