Related Experiment Videos
Lower Cervical Spine Motion Segment Computational Model Validation: Kinematic and Kinetic Response for Quasi-Static
Jeffrey B Barker1, Duane S Cronin2, Roger W Nightingale3
1Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
|April 19, 2017
Summary
This study developed finite element models of lower cervical spine motion segments. Continuous moment-rotation data and cross-correlation are crucial for validating human body models for improved safety.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Computational modeling
- Human body modeling
Background:
- Advanced human body models (HBM) are essential for enhanced safety assessments.
- Validation of motion segments, the basic components of neck models, is critical for reliable HBM predictions.
- Existing validation methods using single-valued data or traditional corridors may not adequately assess model biofidelity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce detailed finite element motion segment models of the lower human cervical spine.
- To assess these models under quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different experimental data types and validation methods for assessing model biofidelity.
Main Methods:
- Developed finite element models of lower cervical spine segments from subject-specific scans.
- Simulated quasi-static loading (flexion, extension, lateral bending, axial rotation) and dynamic loading (flexion, extension).
- Compared simulation results with existing experimental data and new dynamic experimental data, employing cross-correlation for continuous moment-rotation data.
Main Results:
- Single-valued experimental data proved insufficient for comprehensive model biofidelity assessment.
- Traditional corridor methods could overestimate model accuracy with highly variable data.
- Continuous moment-rotation data enabled objective assessment via cross-correlation, highlighting the importance of validating all lower cervical spine segments.
Conclusions:
- The developed finite element motion segment models provide a foundation for biofidelic spine and neck models.
- Objective assessment methods using continuous data are vital for accurate HBM validation.
- Validated HBMs are crucial for understanding and mitigating injury, ultimately improving human safety.