Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other01:20

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

305
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...
305
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition01:24

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

354
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
354
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.9K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.9K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

14.0K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.0K
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy01:24

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

539
Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are grounded in the belief that our thoughts profoundly influence our emotions and actions. Advocates of CBT emphasize three core assumptions: first, that cognitions are identifiable and measurable; second, that they are central to psychological functioning; and third, that irrational or maladaptive beliefs can be replaced with rational and adaptive ones. This transformative approach to therapy has paved the way for specific models such as Albert...
539

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relationship between School Integration, Psychosocial Adjustment and Cyber-Aggression among Adolescents.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2020
Same author

Evaluation of a multi-component and multi-agent intervention to improve classroom social relationships among early elementary school-age children.

Journal of school psychology·2019
Same author

Interpersonal Perceptions of Adverse Peer Experiences in First-Grade Students.

Frontiers in psychology·2018
Same author

An Adjusted Probability Method for the Identification of Sociometric Status in Classrooms.

Frontiers in psychology·2017
Same author

[Spanish adolescents' low perception of risk in alcohol consumption].

Cadernos de saude publica·2017
Same author

Problematic Social Situations for Peer-Rejected Students in the First Year of Elementary School.

Frontiers in psychology·2016
Same journal

A fair lexical decision task for monolingual and multilingual Spanish-speakers.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Post-disaster psychological effects: identifying earthquake-induced trauma in athletes.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

On the contemporary history of learning disability identification procedures-a systematic literature review (1960-2000).

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Adolescent Mental Toughness Questionnaire (aMTQ10): development, validation and norms.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Understanding secondary school students' intentions to learn artificial intelligence: a multigroup structural equation modeling analysis.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Rethinking directiveness in AI coaching chatbots.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 4, 2026

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.3K

Understanding Rejection between First-and-Second-Grade Elementary Students through Reasons Expressed by Rejecters.

Francisco J García Bacete1,2, Virginia E Carrero Planes1, Ghislaine Marande Perrin1,2

  • 1Department of Developmental, Educational and Social Psychology and MethodologyUniversitat Jaume I, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.

Frontiers in Psychology
|April 20, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Young children reject peers for various reasons, including aggression, social issues, and identity-based prejudices. Understanding these factors is key to developing effective interventions for peer rejection.

Keywords:
early elementary educationgrounded theorygroupidentitynormspreferencesreasons for peer rejectionunfamiliarity

More Related Videos

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.9K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 4, 2026

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.3K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.9K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Child Psychology
  • Social Dynamics
  • Developmental Science

Background:

  • Peer rejection is a significant issue affecting children's social and emotional development.
  • Existing research often lacks a comprehensive understanding of young children's perspectives on peer rejection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore and categorize the reasons young children provide for rejecting their peers.
  • To build a theoretical framework for understanding peer rejection from a child's viewpoint.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative study employing Grounded Theory methodology.
  • Semi-structured individual interviews with 853 six-year-old children from urban public schools in Spain.
  • Analysis of 3,009 rejection nominations and 2,934 stated reasons for peer rejection.

Main Results:

  • Seven primary categories of rejection reasons emerged: behavioral costs (aggression, social/school issues, dominance), identity-based reasons (personal preferences, social prejudices), and unfamiliarity.
  • Behavioral reasons highlight negative impacts on individuals and peer groups.
  • Identity-based reasons reflect personal choices and social group dynamics, including outgroup prejudices.

Conclusions:

  • A comprehensive taxonomy of peer rejection reasons was developed, offering new theoretical insights.
  • Findings can inform researchers and practitioners in designing interventions to prevent and mitigate peer rejection.
  • Understanding children's perspectives is crucial for effective anti-rejection strategies.