Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 4, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Growth pattern and final height of very preterm vs. very low birth weight infants
Jonneke J Hollanders1, Sylvia M van der Pal2, Paula van Dommelen2
1Department of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Very preterm (VP) and very low birth weight (VLBW) classifications impact infant growth differently. Gestational age is recommended for future preterm infant studies, especially in industrialized nations.
Area of Science:
- Neonatology
- Pediatric Growth Studies
- Public Health
Background:
- Studies on preterm birth often use very preterm (VP) and very low birth weight (VLBW) as inclusion criteria.
- The distinct impacts of VP and VLBW on postnatal growth trajectories require further quantification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess how classifications based on very preterm birth and/or very low birth weight influence postnatal growth until final adult height.
- To compare growth patterns among infants categorized by VP and VLBW status.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of infants born very preterm and/or with very low birth weight was classified into three groups: VP+/VLBW+, VP+/VLBW-, and VP-/VLBW+.
- Anthropometric measurements were collected from birth up to 19 years of corrected age.
- Longitudinal follow-up included 590 of the original 998 subjects at age 19.
Main Results:
- Infants classified as VP-/VLBW+ had the smallest birth size compared to VP+/VLBW+ and VP+/VLBW- groups.
- The VP-/VLBW+ group exhibited increasing length, weight, and head circumference SD scores during childhood, unlike the other groups.
- Despite catch-up growth, VP-/VLBW+ individuals remained shorter and lighter at age 19.
Conclusions:
- Classification based on very preterm birth and very low birth weight leads to distinct postnatal growth patterns.
- Gestational age is a more appropriate primary criterion for classifying preterm infants in future research, particularly in industrialized countries.
Abstract:
BackgroundBoth very preterm (VP; i.e., gestational age <32 weeks) and very low birth weight (VLBW; i.e., birth weight <1,500 g) are used as inclusion criteria by studies on preterm birth. We aimed to quantify the impact of these entities on postnatal growth until final height.MethodsSubjects born VP and/or with VLBW from the Project On Preterm and Small-for-gestational-age infants cohort were classified as follows: (1) VP+/VLBW+ (n=495), (2) VP+/VLBW- (n=207), or (3) VP-/VLBW+ (n=296) infants. Anthropometric data were collected at birth, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months' corrected age, and at 5 and 19 years. At 19 years, 590/998 (59%) of the subjects enrolled in 1983 were followed up.ResultsBirth size was smallest in the VP-/VLBW+ group compared with the VP+/VLBW+ and VP+/VLBW- groups. During childhood, length, weight, and head circumference SD scores increased in the VP-/VLBW+ group, whereas SD scores in the VP+/VLBW+ and VP+/VLBW- groups either remained stable or decreased. Despite catch-up growth, VP-/VLBW+ infants remained the shortest and lightest at age 19.ConclusionClassification on the basis of VP and VLBW impacts growth, causing different growth patterns for infants born VP+/VLBW+, VP+/VLBW-, or VP-/VLBW+. For future studies, we recommend, at least for industrialized countries, including preterm infants based on gestational age.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Signs of Puberty
Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns
Regression Toward the Mean
z Scores and Area Under the Curve

