Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

05:02
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Is bilingualism losing its advantage? A bibliometric approach
Victor A Sanchez-Azanza1, Raúl López-Penadés1, Lucía Buil-Legaz1
1Department of Applied Pedagogy and Educational Psychology, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Illes Balears (Spain).
Plos One
|April 21, 2017
Summary
Publication trends for the bilingual advantage in executive control are shifting. Research challenging this advantage has increased, with 2014 studies accumulating more citations than supporting ones.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Psycholinguistics
- Bibliometrics
Background:
- The concept of a bilingual advantage in executive control has been a subject of extensive research.
- Bibliometric analysis offers a quantitative approach to understanding research trends and impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze publication trends related to the bilingual advantage in executive control over a decade.
- To assess the impact and citation patterns of studies supporting versus challenging this advantage.
Main Methods:
- Bibliometric indices including publication counts, citation numbers, and journal impact factors were used.
- Studies were categorized based on their abstract's stance on the bilingual advantage: supporting, ambiguous, not mentioning, or challenging.
- Data analysis covered a ten-year period up to June 2016.
Main Results:
- A notable increase in publications challenging the bilingual advantage was observed in 2014 and 2015.
- Average journal impact factors and total citations were similar across categories by June 2016.
- Studies published in 2014 that challenged the advantage garnered more citations by June 2016 than those supporting it.
Conclusions:
- Bibliometric data suggest a shift in publication trends concerning the bilingual advantage in executive control.
- The findings provide evidence-based insights into the evolving landscape of research on bilingualism and cognition.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
Lateralization
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
Language and Cognition
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.

