Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

07:07
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
9.3K
Learning from one's own errors and those of others
1Columbia University, 401B Schermerhorn Hall, New York, NY, 10027, USA. jm348@columbia.edu.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|April 22, 2017
Summary
Generating your own correct answers or errors significantly improves later recall. Hearing others make errors or simply hearing the correct answer does not offer the same learning benefit.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Memory Research
Background:
- Retrieval practice is crucial for memory.
- The specific conditions under which retrieval benefits learning are still being explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of self-generated errors versus hearing correct answers or others' errors on recall.
- To examine the role of being 'on-the-hook' in memory retrieval.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments compared recall performance across different error/response generation conditions.
- Conditions included self-generation of errors/correct answers, hearing others' errors/correct answers, and being 'on-the-hook'.
Main Results:
- Self-generation of correct responses or commission errors enhanced later recall compared to hearing others.
- Being 'on-the-hook' partially offset recall deficits from others' errors but this effect was not robust.
- The benefits of self-generation align with reconsolidation theory.
Conclusions:
- Active self-generation of responses, including errors, strengthens memory traces.
- Memory benefits from retrieval are specific to the agent performing the retrieval, not passive observation.
- Reconsolidation theory provides a framework for understanding why self-generation aids memory.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
11.7K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.7K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors
15.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.6K
Hindsight Biases
4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
4.5K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
112.4K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
112.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K

