Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Social and anthropometric factors explaining racial/ethnical differences in birth weight in the United States
Naho Morisaki1, Ichiro Kawachi2, Emily Oken3
1National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Insights
Racial disparities in infant birth weight are influenced by maternal factors like height and gestational weight gain, not socioeconomic or behavioral traits. Understanding these differences is key to addressing infant health inequities.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Perinatal Epidemiology
- Human Genetics
Background:
- Significant racial and ethnic disparities in infant birth weight are well-documented in the U.S.
- Limited research has systematically explored the specific factors contributing to these birth weight variations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the factors contributing to birth weight differences among 14 distinct racial and ethnic groups in the United States.
- To sequentially adjust for maternal, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors to understand their impact on birth weight variability.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a large dataset of 10,638,415 singleton births in the U.S. from 2009-2012.
- Comparison of average birth weights across 14 racial/ethnic groups, adjusting for multiple variables.
- Sequential adjustment for maternal anthropometrics (height, BMI), gestational weight gain, gestational age, maternal age, parity, and socioeconomic/behavioral factors.
Main Results:
- Birth weights varied significantly across groups, with Japanese infants being 289g lighter and Samoan infants 126g heavier than non-Hispanic white infants.
- Maternal height and BMI explained differences for Asian and Samoan infants; gestational age for Black infants; and gestational weight gain for Japanese infants.
- Maternal age, parity, socioeconomic status, and behavioral factors did not significantly account for birth weight variations among the studied groups.
Conclusions:
- Maternal anthropometrics, gestational weight gain, and preterm birth rates are significant contributors to racial/ethnic birth weight differences.
- Socioeconomic status, maternal age, parity, and behavioral characteristics play a minimal role in explaining these observed disparities.
- Targeted interventions focusing on maternal physical characteristics and pregnancy weight management may help reduce birth weight inequities.
Abstract:
Though disparities in birth weight by race/ethnicity have been extensively reported in the United States, few studies have systematically investigated factors attributing to its variability. For 10,638,415 singleton infants born during 2009-2012 in the United States, we examined birth weight differences among 14 races and ethnicities (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic Black, American Indian, Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Hawaiian, Guamanian, Mexican, Puerto Rican and Cuban), after sequentially adjusting for maternal, socio-economic and behavioral factors. Average birthweight of non-Hispanic white infants was 3381 g, while for other races/ethnicities birth weight ranged from being 289 g smaller in Japanese to 126 g larger in Samoan infants. Factors explaining differences of more than 50 grams in birth weight compared to white infants were: gestational age for black infants, height and body mass index for all Asian and Samoan mothers, and gestational weight gain for Japanese mothers. Difference in maternal age, parity, socioeconomic and behavioral characteristics did not account for significant portion of birthweight variations for any race. Our findings suggest that differences in maternal anthropometrics, gestational weight gain, and preterm birth rate, but not in maternal age, parity, socioeconomic or behavioral characteristics contribute to racial/ethnic differences in birthweight.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Obesity

