Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Field Due To A Thin Straight Wire01:28

Magnetic Field Due To A Thin Straight Wire

6.3K
Consider an infinitely long straight wire carrying a current I. The magnetic field at point P at a distance a from the origin can be calculated using the Biot-Savart law.
6.3K
Standing Electromagnetic Waves01:15

Standing Electromagnetic Waves

2.4K
Electromagnetic waves can be reflected; the surface of a conductor or a dielectric can act as a reflector. As electric and magnetic fields obey the superposition principle, so do electromagnetic waves. The superposition of an incident wave and a reflected electromagnetic wave produces a standing wave analogous to the standing waves created on a stretched string.
Suppose a sheet of a perfect conductor is placed in the yz-plane, and a linearly polarized electromagnetic wave traveling in the...
2.4K
Magnetic Field Due to Two Straight Wires01:18

Magnetic Field Due to Two Straight Wires

5.0K
Consider two parallel straight wires carrying a current of 10 A and 20 A in the same direction and separated by a distance of 20 cm. Calculate the magnetic field at a point "P2", midway between the wires. Also, evaluate the magnetic field when the direction of the current is reversed in the second wire.
5.0K
Magnetic Field Of A Current Loop01:16

Magnetic Field Of A Current Loop

6.6K
Consider a circular loop with a radius a, that carries a current I. The magnetic field due to the current at an arbitrary point P along the axis of the loop can be calculated using the Biot-Savart law.
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Thresholds Based on Waveform Shape and Implications for Guideline Limits.

Health physics·2025
Same author

Analysis of ICNIRP 2020 Basic Restrictions for Localized Radiofrequency Exposure in the Frequency Range above 6 GHz.

Health physics·2022
Same author

Steady state temperature rise in multilayered tissue due to arbitrary periodic SAR using finite difference FFT and transfer function method.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2021
Same author

Model of Steady-state Temperature Rise in Multilayer Tissues Due to Narrow-beam Millimeter-wave Radiofrequency Field Exposure.

Health physics·2019
Same author

Cylindrical waveguide electromagnetic exposure system for biological studies with unrestrained mice at 1.9 GHz.

Health physics·2012
Same author

Dosimetry evaluation of a cylindrical waveguide chamber for unrestrained small rodents at 1.9 GHz.

Bioelectromagnetics·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Electric and Magnetic Field Devices for Stimulation of Biological Tissues
13:29

Electric and Magnetic Field Devices for Stimulation of Biological Tissues

Published on: May 15, 2021

5.8K

Magnetic Field Reference Levels for Arbitrary Periodic Waveforms for Prevention of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

Gregory B Gajda1, Stephen H Bly

  • 1*775 Brookfield Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 1C1.

Health Physics
|April 26, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a method to set safety limits for nerve stimulation from non-sinusoidal magnetic fields, using human MRI data. The new approach ensures consistent safety criteria across various magnetic field waveforms.

More Related Videos

External Excitation of Neurons Using Electric and Magnetic Fields in One- and Two-dimensional Cultures
08:32

External Excitation of Neurons Using Electric and Magnetic Fields in One- and Two-dimensional Cultures

Published on: May 7, 2017

14.1K
Author Spotlight: Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Sensorimotor Control and Learning
14:47

Author Spotlight: Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Sensorimotor Control and Learning

Published on: April 21, 2023

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Electric and Magnetic Field Devices for Stimulation of Biological Tissues
13:29

Electric and Magnetic Field Devices for Stimulation of Biological Tissues

Published on: May 15, 2021

5.8K
External Excitation of Neurons Using Electric and Magnetic Fields in One- and Two-dimensional Cultures
08:32

External Excitation of Neurons Using Electric and Magnetic Fields in One- and Two-dimensional Cultures

Published on: May 7, 2017

14.1K
Author Spotlight: Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Sensorimotor Control and Learning
14:47

Author Spotlight: Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Sensorimotor Control and Learning

Published on: April 21, 2023

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Electromagnetism
  • Occupational Health

Background:

  • Existing guidelines for magnetic field exposure limits (RLs) primarily use sinusoidal waveforms.
  • Environmental magnetic fields often exhibit non-sinusoidal, periodic waveforms.
  • Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) risk assessment requires accurate exposure limits for diverse waveforms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a procedure for deriving RLs for generalized periodic waveforms.
  • To apply the Law of Electrostimulation (LOE) to empirical nerve stimulation threshold data.
  • To establish simple criteria for assessing PNS risk from arbitrary periodic magnetic fields.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized empirical nerve stimulation threshold data from human volunteer MRI experiments.
  • Applied the Law of Electrostimulation (LOE) to analyze various waveforms.
  • Derived waveform-specific amplitude thresholds and converted them to RLs in two frequency regimes.

Main Results:

  • Identified waveform-specific transition frequencies determining RL behavior.
  • Demonstrated identical peak-to-peak amplitude RLs for sinusoidal and non-sinusoidal waveforms above their transition frequencies.
  • Established a consistent functional dependence of RLs on normalized frequency below transition frequencies for all waveforms.

Conclusions:

  • The developed procedure provides a unified approach for setting RLs for diverse periodic magnetic field waveforms.
  • The findings simplify the testing of arbitrary waveforms against PNS potential.
  • The derived criteria offer a more accurate assessment of PNS risk compared to waveform-specific standards.