Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
MDCT Derived Left Ventricular Function in Relation to Echocardiography: Validation and Revising the Role with the
Shilpa Hegde1, Venkatraman Bhat1, Karthik Gadabanahalli1
1Department of Imaging Services, Narayana Health, Bommasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Fully automated software accurately assesses left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) data, correlating well with echocardiography. This technology offers a reliable method for evaluating cardiac function.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Medical Software Development
- Diagnostic Technology
Background:
- Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a key diagnostic tool for coronary artery disease.
- Retrospective gating in CCTA allows for the derivation of left ventricular (LV) functional parameters using automated software.
- Validating these derived parameters against established standards is crucial for enhancing the utility of CCTA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of fully automated software for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using 64-slice CCTA data.
- To correlate LVEF measurements derived from CCTA with those obtained from echocardiography (ECHO).
- To review the role of CT-derived LV function in the context of emerging multidetector CT (MDCT) technologies.
Main Methods:
- 113 patients undergoing 64-slice MDCT CCTA for coronary artery disease evaluation were included.
- Echocardiography (ECHO) was performed within one week of the CCTA scan for comparison.
- Automated software ('Auto ejection fraction') on an advanced workstation analyzed retrospectively ECG-gated CCTA data for LVEF calculation.
Main Results:
- Mean LVEF by ECHO was 58.6 ± 4.5%, while automated CCTA software yielded 58.9 ± 5.4%.
- Pearson's regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between CCTA and ECHO LVEF (r=0.503, P < 0.001).
- Bland-Altman analysis indicated a slight trend for CCTA to report higher LVEF values compared to ECHO.
Conclusions:
- Fully automated software provides a simple, reliable, and user-friendly method for rapid LV functional assessment with good reproducibility.
- While correlation is good, future clinical benefit may be limited by the decreasing number of CCTA studies utilizing retrospective gating.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for...

