Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Assessing Therapeutic Angiogenesis in a Murine Model of Hindlimb Ischemia
Published on: June 8, 2019
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Vascular Claudication-Assessment for Revascularization
, Osmanuddin Ahmed1, Michael Hanley2
1Principal Author, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Insights
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) causes vascular claudication. Noninvasive tests and imaging modalities like catheter angiography are crucial for diagnosing PAD and guiding treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Vascular claudication, a symptom of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), involves muscle pain due to arterial obstructions.
- Noninvasive hemodynamic tests (e.g., ankle-brachial index) are primary for assessing PAD severity.
- Catheter angiography is the gold standard for peripheral artery imaging, especially for endovascular intervention planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the role of various imaging modalities in diagnosing and managing peripheral arterial disease.
- To compare the diagnostic capabilities and limitations of different vascular imaging techniques.
- To highlight the importance of evidence-based guidelines in clinical decision-making for PAD.
Main Methods:
- Review of noninvasive hemodynamic tests (ankle-brachial index, toe-brachial index, segmental pressures, pulse volume recordings).
- Evaluation of vascular imaging modalities: catheter angiography, ultrasound, CT angiography, and MR angiography.
- Analysis of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria and their evidence-based methodology.
Main Results:
- Noninvasive tests reliably establish the presence and severity of arterial obstructions.
- Catheter angiography provides dynamic and accurate peripheral artery depiction, crucial for intervention.
- Noninvasive imaging, combined with hemodynamic tests, can effectively diagnose or exclude PAD, despite individual modality limitations.
Conclusions:
- Accurate diagnosis and staging of peripheral arterial disease rely on a combination of hemodynamic assessment and advanced imaging.
- The choice of imaging modality depends on clinical context, anticipated intervention, and specific diagnostic needs.
- Evidence-based guidelines, like the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria, aid in selecting optimal imaging and treatment strategies for PAD.
Abstract:
Vascular claudication is a symptom complex characterized by reproducible pain and weakness in an active muscle group due to peripheral arterial disease. Noninvasive hemodynamic tests such as the ankle brachial index, toe brachial index, segmental pressures, and pulse volume recordings are considered the first imaging modalities necessary to reliably establish the presence and severity of arterial obstructions. Vascular imaging is consequently used for diagnosing individual lesions and triaging patients for medical, percutaneous, or surgical intervention. Catheter angiography remains the reference standard for imaging the peripheral arteries, providing a dynamic and accurate depiction of the peripheral arteries. It is particularly useful when endovascular intervention is anticipated. When combined with noninvasive hemodynamic tests, however, noninvasive imaging, including ultrasound, CT angiography, and MR angiography, can also reliably confirm or exclude the presence of peripheral arterial disease. All modalities, however, have their own technical limitations when classifying the location, extent, and severity of disease. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
More Related Videos
14:52Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Published on: December 11, 2013
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests