Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.6K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

77.0K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
77.0K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.9K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.9K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

437
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
437
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.3K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.3K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.9K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stabilizing and directional selection shape the genetic variation of gene expression in the transcriptome of Chlamydomonas.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Evolvability: progress and key questions.

Bioscience·2025
Same author

Asymmetry in Cross-Sex Cross-Trait Genetic Covariances and the Evolvability of Sexual Dimorphism.

The American naturalist·2025
Same author

Regularized regression can improve estimates of multivariate selection in the face of multicollinearity and limited data.

Evolution letters·2024
Same author

Using inbreeding to test the contribution of non-additive genetic effects to additive genetic variance: a case study in <i>Drosophila serrata</i>.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2023
Same author

Maintenance of quantitative genetic variance in complex, multitrait phenotypes: the contribution of rare, large effect variants in 2 Drosophila species.

Genetics·2022
Same journal

Coexistence of piRNA and KZFP defense systems: Evolutionary dynamics of layered defense against transposable elements.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Creation and manipulation of bipartite expression transgenes in C. elegans using phiC31 recombinase.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Inherited long telomeres induce a genome-wide transcriptional response in budding yeast.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Dynamics of Quantitative Traits in a Steadily Changing Environment.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Functional Landscape of Zebrafish Gonadotropins and Receptors: A Comprehensive Genetic Analysis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Synergistic actions of Nup43 and Myosin VI drive actin cone assembly during Drosophila spermiogenesis.

Genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
10:17

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

23.4K

Accounting for Sampling Error in Genetic Eigenvalues Using Random Matrix Theory.

Jacqueline L Sztepanacz1, Mark W Blows2

  • 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4072 jsztepanacz@gmail.com.

Genetics
|May 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Genetic eigenvalues from multivariate models follow the Tracy-Widom (TW) distribution. This finding helps distinguish true genetic variance from sampling error, especially for smaller eigenvalues in genetic covariance matrices.

Keywords:
REML-MVNTracy–Widom distributioneigenvaluesgenetic variancerandom matrix theory

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
10:17

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

23.4K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Quantitative genetics
  • Statistical genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Genetic variance in multivariate phenotypes is analyzed using eigenvalues of the genetic covariance matrix.
  • Estimates of genetic eigenvalues are prone to overdispersion due to sampling error, biasing large eigenvalues upward and small ones downward.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate that genetic eigenvalues estimated via restricted maximum likelihood (REML) conform to the Tracy-Widom (TW) distribution.
  • To provide a method for distinguishing sampling error from genuine genetic variance in eigenvalue spectra.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of genetic eigenvalues from multivariate random effects models using REML.
  • Empirical scaling and centering of genetic eigenvalues.
  • Comparison of constrained vs. unconstrained genetic covariance structures.

Main Results:

  • Genetic eigenvalues estimated with an unconstrained covariance structure conform to the TW distribution after scaling and centering.
  • Estimation procedures imposing boundary constraints result in eigenvalues that deviate from the TW distribution.
  • Confidence intervals without TW distribution reference can misinterpret sampling error as genetic variance.

Conclusions:

  • The Tracy-Widom distribution provides a critical threshold for assessing the significance of genetic eigenvalues.
  • Scaling sampling distributions to the TW distribution allows for robust identification of genetic variance exceeding sampling error.
  • This approach enhances the accuracy of interpreting genetic covariance matrix spectra.