Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
The ACEF II Risk Score for cardiac surgery: updated but still parsimonious
Marco Ranucci1, Valeria Pistuddi1, Sabino Scolletta2
1Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese (Milan), Italy.
The updated ACEF II score improves cardiac surgery risk prediction by including emergency cases and anemia. This new tool offers better accuracy than the original ACEF score for stratifying surgical risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Medical Risk Stratification
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- The Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction (ACEF) score is a recognized tool for risk stratification in myocardial revascularization.
- Current guidelines incorporate the ACEF score for evaluating surgical and percutaneous revascularization procedures.
- There is a need for enhanced risk models that account for emergency procedures and pre-operative conditions like anemia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and validate an updated version of the ACEF score, termed ACEF II.
- To improve the accuracy of risk stratification for cardiac surgery patients.
- To incorporate emergency surgery and pre-operative anemia into the risk assessment model.
Main Methods:
- Development and validation of the ACEF II score using two independent cohorts of cardiac surgery patients (7011 and 1687 patients).
- Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify independent predictors of operative mortality.
- The ACEF II score calculation incorporates age, ejection fraction, serum creatinine, emergency surgery status, and hematocrit levels.
Main Results:
- The ACEF II score demonstrated significantly better discrimination (c-statistic 0.814) compared to the original ACEF score (c-statistic 0.773).
- ACEF II showed comparable discrimination to the EuroSCORE II and maintained good calibration in external validation.
- The updated score effectively incorporates emergency surgery and anemia, enhancing its applicability.
Conclusions:
- The ACEF II score provides a more adequate and accurate risk stratification for the contemporary cardiac surgery landscape.
- Inclusion of emergency status and anemia improves the model's relevance and predictive power.
- ACEF II is a valuable tool for assessing operative mortality risk in diverse cardiac surgery patient populations.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Relative Risk
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview