Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

A Syngeneic Mouse Model of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma for Quantitative and Longitudinal Assessment of Preclinical Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2017
Immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Susanne Unverzagt1, Ines Moldenhauer2, Monika Nothacker3
1Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburge Straße 8, Halle/Saale, Germany, 06097.
Targeted immunotherapies, like nivolumab, show promise in treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by reducing mortality and improving quality of life. However, interferon-alpha monotherapy may increase mortality and adverse events in mRCC patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Renal Cell Carcinoma
Background:
- Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment has shifted towards targeted therapies.
- Current guidelines favor targeted agents like sunitinib and pazopanib, with cytokines as alternatives.
- Nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, was approved in 2015 as a targeted immunotherapy for previously treated mRCC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapies, alone or combined with targeted therapies, for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
- To assess treatment effects on patient benefit and outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of multiple databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) and clinical trial registers.
- Inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs for mRCC patients.
- Analysis of summary statistics (risk ratios, mean differences) and quality of evidence using GRADE methodology.
Main Results:
- Interferon-alpha (IFN-α) monotherapy likely increases mortality and adverse events compared to standard targeted therapies.
- IFN-α combined with targeted therapies showed no significant difference in mortality but may increase adverse events.
- Targeted immunotherapy (nivolumab) demonstrated reduced mortality, improved quality of life, and fewer adverse events compared to everolimus in previously treated patients.
Conclusions:
- Moderate-quality evidence suggests IFN-α monotherapy increases mortality, while combination therapy shows no mortality difference but increased adverse events.
- Low-quality evidence indicates IFN-α alone worsens quality of life and increases severe adverse events.
- Moderate-quality evidence supports targeted immunotherapies in reducing mortality and adverse events, and improving quality of life in mRCC.
More Related Videos
11:27Modeling Spontaneous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma mRCC in Mice Following Nephrectomy
Published on: April 29, 2014
11:02Induction of Invasive Transitional Cell Bladder Carcinoma in Immune Intact Human MUC1 Transgenic Mice: A Model for Immunotherapy Development
Published on: October 30, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...