Thiolate Spin Population of Type I Copper in Azurin Derived from 33S Hyperfine Coupling
Marie Ramirez Cohen1, Netanel Mendelman1, Marina Radoul1
1Department of Chemical Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science , Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Abstract:
The electron transfer mediating properties of type I copper proteins stem from the intricate ligand coordination sphere of the Cu ion in their active site. These redox properties are in part due to unusual cysteine thiol coordination, which forms a highly covalent copper-sulfur (Cu-S) bond. The structure and electronic properties of type I copper have been the subject of many experimental and theoretical studies. The measurement of spin delocalization of the Cu(II) unpaired electron to neighboring ligands provides an elegant experimental way to probe the fine details of the electronic structure of type I copper. To date, the crucial parameter of electron delocalization to the sulfur atom of the cysteine ligand has not been directly determined experimentally. We have prepared 33S-enriched azurin and carried out W-band (95 GHz) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and electron-electron double resonance detected NMR (EDNMR) measurements and, for the first time, recorded the 33S nuclear frequencies, from which the hyperfine coupling and the spin population on the sulfur of the thiolate ligand were derived. The overlapping 33S and 14N EDNMR signals were resolved using a recently introduced two-dimensional correlation technique, 2D-EDNMR. The 33S hyperfine tensor was determined by simulations of the EDNMR spectra using 33S hyperfine and quadrupolar tensors predicted by QM/MM DFT calculations as starting points for a manual spectral fit procedure. To reach a reasonable agreement with the experimental spectra, the 33S hyperfine principal value, Az, and one of the corresponding Euler angles had to be modified. The final values obtained gave an experimentally determined sulfur spin population of 29.8 ± 0.7%, significantly improving the wide range of 29-62% reported in the literature. Our direct, experimentally derived value now provides an important constraint for further theoretical work aimed at unravelling the unique electronic properties of this site.
More Related Videos
11:04Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Techniques for Determining the Structure and Mechanisms of Metal Ion Recognition and Redox Activity of Metal Binding Oligopeptides
Published on: September 7, 2019
14:44Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR
Published on: December 16, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
