Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Soft Tissue Changes Around Immediately Placed Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses With at Least 12 Months
Bassam M Kinaia1,2, Filip Ambrosio1, Monica Lamble1
1Department of Periodontology and Dental Hygiene, School of Dentistry, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, MI.
Immediate implant placement (IIP) with thick biotypes and immediate provisionalization shows reduced midfacial recession (MFR) and better papillary height (PH) maintenance compared to other IIP approaches. These findings suggest improved esthetic outcomes for specific patient and treatment factors.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Periodontology
- Esthetic Dentistry
Background:
- Immediate implant placement (IIP) offers predictability but poses esthetic challenges, specifically midfacial recession (MFR) and loss of papillary height (PH).
- Assessing the long-term esthetic impact of IIP is crucial for clinical decision-making and patient satisfaction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the effects of immediate implant placement (IIP) on midfacial recession (MFR) and papillary height (PH).
- To evaluate these esthetic outcomes at least 12 months after functional loading of dental implants.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature review of the Cochrane and MEDLINE databases was conducted, supplemented by a hand search.
- Four independent reviewers assessed study quality and methodology.
- Meta-analyses were performed on eligible studies to quantify the effects of different IIP protocols.
Main Results:
- Conventional implant placement (CIP) showed a trend towards less MFR and better PH than IIP, though not always statistically significant.
- Immediate implant placement (IIP) in patients with thick biotypes demonstrated statistically significant reductions in MFR and improved PH.
- Immediate provisionalization with IIP resulted in significantly better PH maintenance compared to delayed restoration.
Conclusions:
- Immediate implant placement (IIP) in thick biotypes combined with immediate provisionalization yields superior esthetic outcomes (less MFR, better PH) compared to IIP in thin biotypes or with delayed restoration.
- Findings should be interpreted cautiously due to high heterogeneity and a limited number of qualified studies.
- Further research is warranted to confirm these esthetic benefits of specific IIP protocols.
More Related Videos
07:09In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021