Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ventral coxofemoral luxation in poodle breeds: multicentre retrospective case series.

The Journal of small animal practice·2026
Same author

Cumulative gonadal hormone exposure is nonlinearly associated with risk of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease: a generalised additive model analysis of 20,590 dogs (1988-2023).

The Journal of small animal practice·2025
Same author

Use of jejunal serosal patch and pyloric exclusion in the management of complex duodenal injury.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2024
Same author

Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Canadian Association of General Surgeons Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons: Canadian Surgery Forum, Toronto, Ont., September 6-9, 2007.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2023
Same author

Open left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy a viable option in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus·2022
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum 2018: St. John's, NL Sept. 13-15, 2018.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.7K

TU-F-BRCD-01: Tolerance Levels and Methodologies for IMRT Verification QA.

M Miften1,2,3, A Olch1,2,3, D Low1,2,3

  • 1University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

Medical Physics
|May 19, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) ensures accurate cancer treatment delivery. This review provides guidance on IMRT quality assurance (QA) methods, tolerances, and the clinical relevance of failed plans.

Keywords:
CancerConformal radiation therapyDosimetryDrug deliveryIntensity modulated radiation therapyMedical treatment planningRadiation treatmentTesting proceduresTherapeutics

More Related Videos

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
08:54

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Published on: May 8, 2018

15.1K
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.7K
Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
08:54

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Published on: May 8, 2018

15.1K
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a complex, technology-intensive treatment delivering conformal doses, now standard for many cancers.
  • Approximately 30-60% of US cancer patients receive IMRT, necessitating robust verification programs.
  • Existing AAPM reports focus on technical aspects, but lack systematic guidance on patient-specific IMRT verification QA.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss and compare common IMRT measurement methods, including their pros and cons.
  • To review absolute dose verification techniques (1D, 2D, small-volume) and analysis methods (dose-difference, DTA, Gamma analysis), noting vendor variability.
  • To examine IMRT QA passing rates, tolerances, and the clinical significance of failed plans.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of IMRT QA methodologies and analysis techniques.
  • Discussion of various measurement tools and delivery methods for QA.
  • Analysis of reported IMRT QA passing rates and tolerance levels.

Main Results:

  • Common IMRT QA methods and their advantages/disadvantages are presented.
  • Methodologies for absolute dose verification and analysis techniques like Gamma analysis are reviewed.
  • Information on IMRT QA passing rates and the clinical relevance of failed plans is discussed.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic guidance on IMRT verification QA methodologies, tools, and tolerances is needed.
  • Understanding the pros and cons of different QA methods is crucial for accurate IMRT delivery.
  • Assessing the clinical relevance of failed IMRT QA is essential for patient safety.