Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square01:18

Finding Critical Values for Chi-Square

4.6K
Consider a curve representing sample data drawn randomly from a normally distributed population. One must construct confidence intervals to estimate or to test a claim regarding the population standard deviation. For example, a 95% confidence interval covers 95% of the area under the curve, and the remaining 5% is equally distributed on either side of the curve. To achieve such confidence intervals, one must determine the critical values. The critical values are simply the values separating the...
4.6K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.2K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.2K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

10.9K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
10.9K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.0K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.0K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.8K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.8K
Critical Values01:31

Critical Values

10.5K
A critical value is a definite value obtained from a particular probability distribution at a predecided confidence level (or a predecided significance level) for a given population parameter. The critical value provides demarcation that separates the sample statistics that are likely to occur from the ones that are unlikely to occur based on the given probability distribution and the population parameter to be estimated. The critical value for normal distribution is obtained from the z...
10.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of low-mode symmetry on inertial fusion energy output in the burning plasma state.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

An occupational health survey of the UK's mortuary workforce.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2023
Same author

Evaluation of electropolymerized molecularly imprinted polymers (E-MIPs) on disposable electrodes for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.

Analytica chimica acta·2022
Same author

Publisher Correction: Burning plasma achieved in inertial fusion.

Nature·2022
Same author

Burning plasma achieved in inertial fusion.

Nature·2022
Same author

Association between occupational exposures and sarcoma incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Systematic reviews·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 9, 2014

12.3K

SU-E-T-16: Statistical Variability and Confidence Intervals for Planar Dose QA Pass Rates.

D Bailey1,2,3, B Nelms1,2,3, L Kumaraswamy1,2,3

  • 1Dept of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo NY.

Medical Physics
|May 19, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Pass rates from low-density detector arrays in radiation therapy are not absolute. Reporting these pass rates with confidence intervals is crucial for accurate uncertainty quantification.

Keywords:
Detector arraysError analysisImage guided radiation therapyIntensity modulated radiation therapyMedical treatment planning

More Related Videos

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

16.7K
Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 9, 2014

12.3K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

16.7K
Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Dosimetry

Background:

  • Comparing measured and calculated dose planes commonly uses pass rates based on percent difference and distance-to-agreement (DTA).
  • Low areal-density detector arrays are often used, leading to statistical uncertainty in pass rate calculations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the statistical uncertainty of planar dose comparison pass rates.
  • To propose methods for establishing confidence intervals for pass rates obtained with low detector-density arrays.

Main Methods:

  • Acquired absolute dose planes using EPID for intensity-modulated fields.
  • Simulated low-density grids by sampling high-density EPID data with varying detector densities and orientations.
  • Calculated pass rates using various composite analysis techniques for each simulation.

Main Results:

  • Pass rates exhibit a distribution of possible values for each dose plane pair, regardless of detector grid uniformity.
  • Binomial distribution can predict these distributions and approximate confidence intervals based on sampling density and observed pass rate.
  • Example: 95% confidence intervals for IMRT pass rates (2%,2mm) average +/-5.3% and +/-3.8% with 1 and 2 detectors/cm² grids, respectively.

Conclusions:

  • Pass rates from low-density array measurements are not absolute and require reporting with calculation methods and confidence intervals.
  • These findings are applicable to 3D detector arrays.
  • Fixed 'action levels' for pass rates need reevaluation for low-density array measurements.