Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 2, 2026

09:10
Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
Published on: July 12, 2022
3.6K
Reliability and repeatability of pulp volume reconstruction through three different volume calculations
T Y Marroquin Penaloza1, S Karkhanis1, S I Kvaal2
1School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology
|May 19, 2017
Summary
Different segmentation methods for dental pulp volume reconstruction show correlation but lack sensitivity for small changes. Automatic segmentation is particularly sensitive to parameter variations, requiring further research in imaging techniques.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Accurate dental pulp volume reconstruction is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring pulp canal conditions.
- Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is increasingly used for dental imaging, offering detailed volumetric data.
- Evaluating the variability of segmentation methods is essential for reliable pulp volume assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the variability in dental pulp volume measurements using different segmentation techniques.
- To determine the sensitivity of various methods in detecting small volume changes within the dental pulp canal.
- To investigate the impact of parameter variations on automatic segmentation results.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Osirix® and ITK-SNAP software for image analysis.
- Applied diverse segmentation methods (Part A) and volume calculation approaches (Part B) to 21 upper canine CBCT scans.
- Tested data set combinations on a lower molar and upper canine to evaluate automatic segmentation variability (Part C).
Main Results:
- A significant correlation (r > 0.75) was observed among the tested methods.
- No method demonstrated sufficient sensitivity to detect minor volume alterations in the dental pulp canal.
- Automatic segmentation proved highly susceptible to variations in setting parameters.
Conclusions:
- Current volumetric reconstruction and pulp/tooth volume ratio methods do not outperform traditional dental radiographs.
- Further research and advancements in imaging techniques are warranted to improve pulp volume assessment.
- Continued investigation into novel segmentation and reconstruction approaches is recommended.

