Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.6K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.8K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.8K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.5K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.5K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

898
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
898
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.2K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cluster-based law enforcement body armor sizing system: Concept, procedure, and design practice.

Applied ergonomics·2024
Same author

Design for All - Design for Disabled: How important is anthropometry?

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2022
Same author

Encumbered and Traditional Anthropometry of Law Enforcement Officers for Vehicle Workspace and Protective Equipment Design.

Human factors·2021
Same author

Needs and Procedures for a National Anthropometry Study of Law Enforcement Officers.

Human factors·2021
Same author

Analysis of hand-forearm anthropometric components in assessing handgrip and pinch strengths of school-aged children and adolescents: a partial least squares (PLS) approach.

BMC pediatrics·2021
Same author

Anthropometric Dimensions of Individuals With High Body Mass Index.

Human factors·2019
Same journal

Peri-Pubertal Height Shifts and Stable Photoperiod-Associated Geographic Patterning Before and After COVID-19 in Japanese Children.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2026
Same journal

The Evolution of Digit Ratio (2D:4D) From 1998 to 2025: A Bibliometric Analysis.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Associations of Obesity, Movement Behaviors, and Socioeconomic Status With Fundamental Movement Skills in Children: Results From the REACT Project".

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2026
Same journal

Response to Letter to the Editor: Association of Air Pollution With Adiposity Rates in Active Runners and Inactive People.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2026
Same journal

Weight Perception Varies by Local Peer Body Size Norms Among US Adolescents.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2026
Same journal

Increased Vulnerability to Dehydration Due to Heat Stress and Drought Across Reproductive States for Pastoralist Women in Northern Kenya.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

28.0K

Interobserver error in a large scale anthropometric survey.

Claire C Gordon1, Bruce Bradtmiller2

  • 1Anthropology Branch, Science & Advanced Technology Directorate, U.S. Army Natick Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Natick, Massachusetts 01760-5020.

American Journal of Human Biology : the Official Journal of the Human Biology Council
|May 20, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Minimizing interobserver error in anthropometric surveys is crucial for accurate population comparisons. This study found that setting error limits beforehand and daily data review reduced measurement errors more effectively than expert lab trials.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

2.1K
Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
13:35

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos

Published on: March 21, 2021

11.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 2, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

28.0K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

2.1K
Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
13:35

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos

Published on: March 21, 2021

11.9K

Area of Science:

  • Anthropometry
  • Biostatistics
  • Human Biology

Background:

  • Interobserver error significantly impacts morphometric population comparisons.
  • Quality control measures can minimize, but not eliminate, interobserver error.
  • Standard laboratory trials may not fully represent real-world measurement variability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate methods for minimizing interobserver error in large-scale anthropometric surveys.
  • To pre-set acceptable observer error limits for quality control.
  • To compare field-based error control with expert laboratory trials.

Main Methods:

  • Two expert pairs conducted interobserver error trials.
  • Field repeatability data were collected twice daily.
  • Measurer drift was monitored and corrected through daily data review.

Main Results:

  • Field-obtained interobserver errors were lower than expert lab errors for 27 of 30 dimensions.
  • Pre-set error limits and daily review reduced measurement error magnitude.
  • Despite quality control, 17 dimensions showed statistically significant directional bias between measurers.

Conclusions:

  • Establishing permissible interobserver error limits and frequent field data review effectively reduces measurement error in anthropometric surveys.
  • These quality control strategies can yield lower error rates than expert laboratory settings.
  • Even small directional biases require careful consideration for biological relevance in population studies.