Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

309
Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...
309

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increasing Familial Retinoblastoma in High-Income Countries Despite Stable Overall Incidence, 2017-2024.

Ophthalmology. Retina·2026
Same author

Visual morbidity, long-term outcome and prognostic factors in infants and young children with optic pathway low-grade glioma.

Neuro-oncology practice·2026
Same author

Mastering the question: tips and examples for effective ophthalmology exams.

Community eye health·2026
Same author

Improving gynecological pathology access with the OpenFlexure Microscope.

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society·2026
Same author

Feasibility and reproducibility of handheld and table-mounted optical coherence tomography in children with craniosynostosis.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same author

Can provision of near vision glasses as an early intervention improve visual outcomes in infants at risk of perinatal brain insult? The Babies in Glasses (BiG) randomised feasibility trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain, performance anxiety, and stress-producing life events among orchestral players in Brazil: An observational study.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

From dirty work to safety performance: A mixed-methods study on chemical workers' safety compliance and participation in China.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Interventions to manage back pain in agriculture, horticulture, and seafood workers - A scoping review.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Working under digital pressure: Electronic performance monitoring, psychological contracts, and job crafting among construction and engineering professionals.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

From exclusion to inclusion: How spiritual leadership shapes workplace relationships.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

An easier government? The impact of digital government platform on government employee overtime.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.4K

Design for All - Design for Disabled: How important is anthropometry?

Gunther Paul1, Isabella Tiziana Steffan2, Nana Itoh3

  • 1Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

Work (Reading, Mass.)
|September 26, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Design for All (or Universal Design) is gaining traction due to ageing populations. However, a lack of standardized anthropometric data for people with disabilities hinders inclusive design and accessibility efforts globally.

Keywords:
Universal Designarchitectural accessibilitydisabled personsstandardizationstandards

More Related Videos

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.2K
Clinical-oriented Three-dimensional Gait Analysis Method for Evaluating Gait Disorder
06:54

Clinical-oriented Three-dimensional Gait Analysis Method for Evaluating Gait Disorder

Published on: March 4, 2018

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.4K
Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.2K
Clinical-oriented Three-dimensional Gait Analysis Method for Evaluating Gait Disorder
06:54

Clinical-oriented Three-dimensional Gait Analysis Method for Evaluating Gait Disorder

Published on: March 4, 2018

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Ergonomics
  • Inclusive Design
  • Accessibility Standards

Background:

  • Design for All (Universal Design) is an emerging field within Ergonomics.
  • Globally ageing populations are increasing interest in Design for All.
  • This field addresses the needs of differently-abled individuals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize workshop outcomes from the International Ergonomics Association Congress.
  • To expand Ergonomics into inclusive design for diverse user needs.
  • To establish a platform for future ergonomic standards and inclusive design guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Contributions from international accessibility design experts.
  • Analysis of anthropometric data issues in Design for All.
  • Review of national and international accessibility standardization (e.g., ISO, EN).

Main Results:

  • A significant knowledge gap in anthropometry for people with disabilities was identified in 1990.
  • Progress in bridging this gap and enabling ergonomic standardization has been minimal globally since 1990.
  • Lack of standardization complicates data provision for mobility and accessibility design.

Conclusions:

  • Standardization in anthropometric data for people with physical disabilities remains a critical issue.
  • This lack of data hinders the development of effective accessibility standards.
  • Further efforts are needed to inform inclusive design guidelines and extend user ranges.