Comparing viral load metrics and evaluating their use for HIV surveillance
Renee Bolijn1, Eline L M Op de Coul1, Ard van Sighem2
1Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Objectives:
To investigate the value of in-care viral load (ICVL) and other viral load (VL) metrics for HIV surveillance by comparing time trends and associations with numbers of new HIV diagnoses.
Methods:
Data from 20,740 HIV patients registered in the Dutch ATHENA-cohort between 2002 and 2013 were used. We compared: six ICVL metrics (i.e. mean of the mean/first/last/highest log VL, median of the median log VL, first log VL for newly diagnosed combined with mean log VL for all others), log VL at diagnosis, proportion of patients with transmission risk (>400 copies/ml) or suppressed VL (≤200 copies/ml). Subgroup differences were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests. Negative binomial regression was used for studying associations between VL metrics and numbers of new diagnoses 1-4 years later.
Results:
Most ICVL metrics showed similar decreasing trends over time. Differences in covariables were found for all VL metrics. Mean ICVL showed the strongest association with new diagnoses: a decrease of one log unit in mean ICVL was associated with a 21% decrease in new diagnoses two years later.
Conclusions:
VL metrics may be of value for enhancing HIV surveillance by identifying subgroup differences in impact of treatment on viral suppression, and by predicting numbers of new diagnoses in subsequent years.
