Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Prescribers' Knowledge and Skills for Interpreting Research Results: A Systematic Review
Leila Kahwati1, Dennis Carmody, Nancy Berkman
1Dr. Kahwati: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. Mr. Carmody: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. Dr. Berkman: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. Dr. Sullivan: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD. Dr. Aikin: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD. Dr. DeFrank: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Physicians show limited critical appraisal skills, impacting medication prescribing. Understanding research evidence, including statistical methods and study biases, is crucial for effective clinical decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Clinical Research Methodology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Physician prescribing practices are influenced by their ability to interpret medical research.
- Critical appraisal skills involve understanding statistical methods, study biases, and evidence validity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize research on prescribers' critical appraisal knowledge and skills.
- To evaluate the relationship between critical appraisal abilities and prescribing behaviors.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of studies from 1990-2015 in the US, UK, and Canada.
- Inclusion of studies measuring critical appraisal knowledge, skills, attitudes, or behaviors in prescribers.
- Narrative synthesis of data from 29 selected studies.
Main Results:
- Physicians' critical appraisal knowledge and skills were generally low to moderate.
- Formal education in epidemiology and biostatistics correlated with higher skill levels.
- Relative effect measures, compared to absolute measures, increased perceived effectiveness and prescribing intent.
Conclusions:
- Physicians' critical appraisal skills are often insufficient for optimal evidence interpretation.
- The choice of effect measure significantly influences perceptions of treatment efficacy and prescribing decisions.
- Further research is needed to understand how critical appraisal skills integrate with other factors influencing prescribing behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
Patient-centered Care
Critical Thinking I
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Blind Procedures

