Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Speciation Rates

Speciation Rates

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Generation of spermatid-like cells from testicular biopsies obtained from prepubertal boys.

F&S science·2026

Same author

Dissecting the coordinated progression of cell states in spatial transcriptomics with CoPro.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Single-cell Transcriptomic Variance Analysis Reveals Intercellular Circadian Desynchrony in the Alzheimer's Affected Human Brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Controlling nephron precursor differentiation to generate proximal-biased kidney organoids with emerging maturity.

Nature communications·2025

Same author

Single cell phototransfection of mRNAs encoding SARS-CoV2 spike and nucleocapsid into human astrocytes results in RNA dependent translation interference.

Frontiers in drug delivery·2025

Same author

Emerging threats to Antarctic conservation.

Nature ecology & evolution·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

ACCURACY OF PHYLOGENETIC-ESTIMATION METHODS UNDER UNEQUAL EVOLUTIONARY RATES.

Junhyong Kim¹, Mark A Burgman¹

¹Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, 11794.

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution

|June 1, 2017

Summary

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation consistently outperformed maximum parsimony and phenetic clustering in accuracy across simulated genetic data. This finding highlights maximum likelihood as a superior method for reconstructing evolutionary relationships.

More Related Videos

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

Area of Science:

Evolutionary biology
Bioinformatics
Computational phylogenetics

Background:

Phylogenetic estimation is crucial for understanding evolutionary relationships.
Various methods exist, including maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and phenetic clustering.
Assessing method accuracy under diverse evolutionary scenarios is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

To comparatively evaluate the accuracy of three phylogenetic estimation methods.
To assess performance on simulated genetic data with varying evolutionary rates.
To identify the most reliable method for phylogenetic inference.

Main Methods:

Simulated genetic drift data across a four-species tree topology.
Varied population sizes and rates of change in different lineages.
Applied maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and phenetic clustering algorithms.

Main Results:

Accuracy of all methods depended on the number of genetic loci (characters).
Maximum likelihood demonstrated superior and consistent accuracy compared to other methods.
Maximum parsimony and phenetic clustering showed lower performance.

Conclusions:

Maximum likelihood is a more robust approach for phylogenetic estimation.
The choice of phylogenetic method significantly impacts accuracy.
Further research can explore method performance with more complex datasets.