Related Experiment Videos

[Quality Controls in Hospitals by MDK Hessen: A Practice Report of Experiences and Outlook]

Sebastian Ritter1, Frauke Lehr1, Thomas Gaertner2

  • 1Team Consulting stationär, Geschäftsbereich Krankenhaus, Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung Hessen, Oberursel.

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband Der Arzte Des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))
|June 1, 2017
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Hospital quality controls by the Medical Review Board of the Statutory Health Insurance Funds (MDK) reveal significant deficits, underscoring the need for independent oversight to ensure patient-centered care and improve hospital quality nationwide.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement in Healthcare
  • Hospital Administration

Background:

  • The German Hospital Structure Act introduced § 275a SGB V, mandating enhanced quality controls in hospitals by the Medical Review Board of the Statutory Health Insurance Funds (MDK).
  • These controls aim to ensure high-quality, patient-centered, and needs-based medical care for the population.
  • This study evaluates the practicability of these quality controls based on a decade of experience from the Hessian MDK.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the practicability of hospital quality controls mandated by § 275a SGB V.
  • To assess the effectiveness of quality control measures implemented by the Hessian MDK.
  • To provide insights for nationwide implementation of future hospital quality controls.

Main Methods:

  • Quality controls were conducted according to regulations from the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) for special care and the German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information (DIMDI) for complex procedures.
  • Inspections involved on-site evaluations by specialized MDK teams, engaging medical staff and hospital management.
  • Data were collected over a 10-year period (2006-2016) in Hessian hospitals.

Main Results:

  • 357 G-BA-related quality controls revealed unmet requirements in approximately 20% of cases.
  • 1624 DIMDI-related quality controls showed unmet standards in about 40% of cases.
  • Identified deficits highlight areas for improvement in hospital structural quality and procedural compliance.

Conclusions:

  • The study confirms the necessity of quality control by an independent body to address identified deficits.
  • These quality controls are crucial for assuring and enhancing the quality of hospital structures, processes, and patient outcomes.
  • The established quality control practices in Hesse are transferable and applicable to nationwide quality assurance initiatives.

Related Concept Videos