Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

10:50
Rearing and Long-Term Maintenance of Eristalis tenax Hoverflies for Research Studies
Published on: May 19, 2018
14.4K
FINE-GRAINED SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION IN SELECTION DOES NOT MAINTAIN GENETIC VARIATION IN ERIGERON ANNUUS
Donald A Stratton1, Cynthia C Bennington1
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, 08544.
Summary
Plant fitness varies greatly over small distances and between years, making it unpredictable. This fine-scale variation, driven by soil nutrients, does not effectively maintain genetic diversity, favoring generalist plants instead.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Plant Science
Background:
- Plant interactions are spatially local, influencing evolutionary dynamics through environmental heterogeneity.
- Limited knowledge exists on spatial fitness variation and the relative impact of spatial versus temporal selection variation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the spatial patterns of fitness variation in Erigeron annuus.
- To determine the relative magnitudes of spatial and temporal variation in selection.
- To explore the evolutionary consequences of this variation on genetic diversity.
Main Methods:
- 12 genotypes of Erigeron annuus were planted across 288 locations over two years.
- Relative fitness was measured, and spatial variation was analyzed at scales from 0.1 to 30.0 m.
- Genotype-environment interactions and the influence of soil nutrients, vegetation, and microtopography were assessed.
Main Results:
- Most spatial fitness variation (genotype-environment interactions) occurred over distances of 50 cm.
- Yearly effects on fitness were as significant as spatial variation, with a strong three-way interaction at the smallest scale.
- The genetic correlation of fitness across years was near zero, indicating unpredictable relative fitness.
- Soil nutrients explained most spatial variation, but likely served as indicators for unknown factors.
- Simulations showed the spatial scale was too fine to maintain genetic variation; inclusion of temporal variation reduced genotype coexistence.
Conclusions:
- Spatial and temporal variation in selection, particularly at fine scales, do not necessarily maintain genetic diversity.
- The observed pattern favors generalist genotypes over specialists.
- Understanding the scale and nature of selection is crucial for predicting evolutionary trajectories.
Keywords:
Fitnessgenotype-environment interactionnatural selectionspatial variationtemporal variationMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Frequency-dependent Selection
24.3K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.3K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
65.0K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
65.0K
Genetic Drift
44.5K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
44.5K
Gene Flow
38.4K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
38.4K
Types of Selection
45.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
45.6K
Genetics of Speciation
22.5K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
22.5K

