Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

336
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
336
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

522
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
522
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

14.8K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
14.8K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.5K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.5K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.9K
The Anderson-Darling Test01:16

The Anderson-Darling Test

1.2K
The Anderson-Darling test is a statistical method used to determine whether a data sample is likely drawn from a specific theoretical distribution. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require assumptions about specific parameters of the distribution. Instead, it compares the sample's empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) with the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the hypothesized distribution. Critical values for the test are specific to the chosen distribution rather...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Refining effect size measures and classification for differential item functioning: Toward unified guidelines across methods.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same author

Enhancing Psychometric Analysis with Interactive SIA Modules.

Psychometrika·2026
Same author

The practice of aggregating lower level predictors in clustered data: A reflection on reflective variables.

Psychological methods·2025
Same author

White Matter Abnormalities and Cognition in Aging and Alzheimer Disease.

JAMA neurology·2025
Same author

Annotations of <i>LSE</i> Research: Students Identify How to Support their Transfer from Community College.

CBE life sciences education·2025
Same author

AlphaFold 2, but not AlphaFold 3, predicts confident but unrealistic β-solenoid structures for repeat proteins.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Checking Equity: Why Differential Item Functioning Analysis Should Be a Routine Part of Developing Conceptual

Patrícia Martinková1, Adéla Drabinová2,3, Yuan-Ling Liaw4

  • 1Institute of Computer Science, Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha 182 07, Czech Republic martinkova@cs.cas.cz.

CBE Life Sciences Education
|June 3, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis identifies biased assessment items. Routine DIF analysis ensures fairer, more valid scores, especially in conceptual assessments, by preventing incorrect conclusions about test fairness.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.9K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.9K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Educational Measurement
  • Psychometrics
  • Assessment Development

Background:

  • Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis is crucial for detecting bias in assessments.
  • Simply comparing total scores between groups can be misleading regarding test fairness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a tutorial on DIF analysis methods.
  • To demonstrate the importance of DIF analysis in identifying item bias.
  • To highlight the necessity of DIF analysis for equitable assessment development.

Main Methods:

  • Explanation of various DIF analysis methodological approaches.
  • Testing for gender bias in two distinct scenarios.
  • Illustration with real data (Homeostasis Concept Inventory) and simulated data.

Main Results:

  • A significant difference in total scores between groups can occur without item bias.
  • Item bias can be present even when groups have identical total score distributions.
  • DIF items require reevaluation by content experts for revision or removal.

Conclusions:

  • DIF analysis is essential for developing fair and valid conceptual assessments.
  • Routine DIF analysis ensures equitable scores and prevents misinterpretations of test fairness.
  • Content expert review of DIF items is necessary for assessment integrity.