Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Psychometric evaluation of the Moral Distress Risk Scale: A methodological study
Rafaela Schaefer1, Elma Lcp Zoboli2, Margarida M Vieira1
1Catholic University of Portugal, Portugal.
Background::
Moral distress is a kind of suffering that nurses may experience when they act in ways that are considered inconsistent with moral values, leading to a perceived compromise of moral integrity. Consequences are mostly negative and include physical and psychological symptoms, in addition to organizational implications.
Objective::
To psychometrically test the Moral Distress Risk Scale.
Research Design::
A methodological study was realized. Data were submitted to exploratory factorial analysis through the SPSS statistical program.
Participants And Research Context::
In total, 268 nurses from hospitals and primary healthcare settings participated in this research during the period of March to June of 2016.
Ethical Considerations::
This research has ethics committee approval.
Findings::
The Moral Distress Risk Scale is composed of 7 factors and 30 items; it shows evidence of acceptable reliability and validity with a Cronbach's α = 0.913, a total variance explained of 59%, a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.896, and a significant Bartlett <0.001.
Discussion::
Concerns about moral distress should be beyond acute care settings, and a tool to help clarify critical points in other healthcare contexts may add value to moral distress speech.
Conclusion::
Psychometric results reveal that the Moral Distress Risk Scale can be applied in different healthcare contexts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Ethics in Research
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

